ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Gender Differences in Clinical Practice Regarding Coronary Heart Disease: A Systematic Review.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Suboptimal LDL-Cholesterol Control Under the 2019 ESC/EAS Dyslipidemia Guidelines: Results From the Nationwide TEMD-2 Study in Type 2 Diabetes.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026Article
- Sex differences and gender-related factors in the management and perception of LDL-cholesterol in ASCVD: Real-Life evidence from the EPHESUS registry in cardiology practice.Atherosclerosis plus · 2026Article
- Article
- Sex-Based Differences in Long-Term Outcomes Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Chronic Total Occlusions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Temporal trends in acute coronary syndrome among women and association with socioeconomic factors-evidence from a middle-income country.Frontiers in global women's health · 2026Article
- Gender Disparities in Ischemic Heart Disease Management: Underdiagnosis in Women and Differences in Treatment.Cureus · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.