ArticleCancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers2024
A nomogram based on preoperative NLR predicts distant metastasis of urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.
Article in Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BackgroundDistant metastasis (DM) remains the most commonly reported cause of death in patients with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB).ObjectiveWe aimed to develop a robust prognostic model to assess the risk of DM in patients with UCB.MethodsWe collected clinical data of 206 UCB patients treated with RC. Patients treated with RC between 2011-2015 that were enrolled as the training cohort (n = 105), while the patients between 2016-2019 were enrolled as the validation cohort (n = 101). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were used to identify independent risk factors associated with DM. We identified the variables by stepwise regression and established nomogram. We evaluated the nomograms using C-index, calibration and ROC curves. Decision curve analysis was performed to compare the net benefits between the nomogram and TNM staging. We divided the patients into high and low risk groups according to the nomogram and compared the DM between the groups.ResultsThe neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was an independent predictor of DM. We established nomogram by T-stage, N-stage and NLR. The C-index of the nomogram was 0.766 and 0.739 respectively in the two cohorts. In the training cohort, AUC for the nomogram at 1, 2 and 3 years was 0.816, 0.812 and 0.812, respectively. In the validation cohort, the AUC for the nomogram at 1, 2 and 3 years was 0.751, 0.757 and 0.716, respectively. The calibration curve was satisfactory. The nomogram has a higher clinical benefit compared to the TNM staging system. Kaplan-Meier curves showed that patients from the high-risk group had a higher probability of DM than patients from the low-risk group.ConclusionsNomograms established by NLR, T-stage and N-stage can accurately predict distant metastases in patients with UCB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.