ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
The Current State of the Art in Autologous Breast Reconstruction: A Review and Modern/Future Approaches.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrated Microsurgical Rehabilitation Using Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction Combined With Vascularized Lymph Node Transfer and Abdominoplasty.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Autologous vs. implant-based breast reconstruction and long-term mental disorder risk: a retrospective cohort study emulating a target trial.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Article
- Redefining Reconstruction: Technological Innovations in Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction.Cancers · 2025Review
- The Rise and Refinement of Breast Thread Lifting: A Contemporary Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Cost of hospital admission after autologous breast reconstruction and factors associated with increased cost: a population-based cohort study.Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgieArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.