SynthesisMedical & biological engineering & computing2025
Systematic review of artificial intelligence methods for detection and segmentation of unruptured intracranial aneurysms using medical imaging.
Synthesis in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in neurovascular surgery: advancing diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Unruptured intracranial aneurysms are protuberances that appear in cerebral arteries, and their diagnostic evaluation can be a complex, time-consuming, and exhaustive task. In recent years, computer-aided systems have been developed to improve diagnostic processes. Although the proposed methods have already been reviewed to assess their suitability for clinical use, the segmentation methods have not been reviewed in detail, nor has there been a standardized way to compare segmentation and detection tasks. A systematic review was conducted to examine the technical and methodological factors contributing to this limitation. The analysis encompassed 49 studies conducted between 2019 and 2023 that utilized artificial intelligence methods and any medical imaging modality for the detection or segmentation of intracranial aneurysms. Most of the included studies focused exclusively on detection (57%), magnetic resonance angiography was the predominant imaging modality (47%), and the methodologies generally used 3D imaging as the input (71%). The reported sensitivities ranged from 0.68 to 0.90, specificities from 0.18 to 1.0, false positives per case from 0.18 to 13.8, and the Dice similarity coefficient from 0.53 to 0.98. Variations in aneurysm size were found to have a substantial impact on system performance. Studies were evaluated using a diagnostic accuracy study quality assessment tool, which revealed significant concerns regarding applicability. These concerns primarily stem from the poor reproducibility and inconsistent reporting of metrics. Recommendations for reporting outcomes were made to compare procedures across different types of imaging and tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40095414What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.