ArticlePharmacoepidemiology and drug safety2025
A Comparative Real-World Study Evaluating the Safety of Immune Globulin Infusion (Human) 10% Solution and Other Intravenous Immunoglobulin Therapies for the Treatment of Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy.
Article in Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advances in the treatment of autoimmune nodopathy: based on treatment strategies of CIDP.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeImmune globulin infusion (human) 10% solution (GAMMAGARD LIQUID; GGL), an intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), has recently received U.S. approval for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP). We evaluated thrombotic events, acute kidney injury (AKI), and hemolytic events among patients with CIDP initiating IVIG treatment with GGL, versus a U.S.-approved IVIG comparator for CIDP, in individual and combined cohorts of immunoglobulin (Ig)-naive and Ig-experienced participants.
methodsThis active-comparator, new-user, cohort study of patients with CIDP used the Merative MarketScan Research and Optum Clinformatics Data Mart databases (2008-2019). Outcomes were compared between adults receiving GGL and comparator IVIGs within propensity score-weighted samples using hazard ratios (HRs) and time period-specific risk ratios (RRs) and risk differences (RDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Database-specific results were meta-analyzed and appropriate.
resultsData from eligible patients in MarketScan (GGL, n = 1441; comparators, n = 2708) and Optum (GGL, n = 644; comparators, n = 1293) were analyzed. Across both databases, HRs, 1-year RRs, and 1-year RDs for thrombotic events did not suggest consistent differences in risk across treatment groups (e.g., MarketScan combined cohort: RR 1.14 [95% CI, 0.50 to 2.55]; Optum combined cohort: 0.60 [0.25 to 1.54]). Similarly, there was no difference in AKI risk between groups (e.g., MarketScan combined cohort: RR 1.25 [95% CI, 0.65 to 2.54]; Optum combined cohort: 0.65 [0.22 to 1.94]). Hemolytic events were rare.
conclusionsThrombotic events, AKI, and hemolytic events were rare among patients with CIDP receiving IVIG. There were no consistently different outcome risks between patients receiving GGL versus other IVIGs with US approval for CIDP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.