Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40095384›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports2025

Data-Driven Recommendations for Assessing the Early-Phase Rate of Torque Development: An Intersession Reliability Study in Physically Active Men and Women.

Merete Brink Speedtsberg, Mette Kreutzfeldt Zebis, Lars Louis Andersen, Rasmus Søndergaard, Per Hölmich, Per Aagaard, Jesper Bencke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Merete Brink SpeedtsbergHuman Movement Analysis Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Amager-Hvidovre Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2076-4556
Mette Kreutzfeldt ZebisDepartment of Midwifery, Physiotherapy, Occupational Therapy and Psychomotor Therapy, Faculty of Health, University College Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5301-3241
Lars Louis AndersenNational Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2777-8085
Rasmus SøndergaardDepartment of Midwifery, Physiotherapy, Occupational Therapy and Psychomotor Therapy, Faculty of Health, University College Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Per HölmichSports Orthopedic Research Center-Copenhagen (SORC-C), Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager-Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2098-0272
Per AagaardDepartment of Sport and Clinical Biomechanics, Muscle Physiology and Biomechanics Research Unit, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9773-7361
Jesper BenckeHuman Movement Analysis Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Amager-Hvidovre Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5959-6994

Funding

Novo Nordisk Fonden
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to provide data-driven recommendations for assessing early-phase rate of torque development (RTD) in isometric knee extension and flexion, focusing on the optimal number of repetitions performed and trial selection criteria to ensure robust intersession reliability. Twenty subjects (10 males, 10 females) completed two test sessions with nine repetitions of unilateral "fast and strong" isometric contractions for the knee extensors and flexors. RTD was calculated from torque onset to 50 ms (RTD50) and 100 ms (RTD100), and peak RTD was assessed in a moving 50 ms interval within the first 100 ms (Peak50). Intersession reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for three to nine repetitions and four different criteria for trial selection. A mixed-effect linear regression model was performed with measured RTD as dependent variable with number of repetitions, selection criteria, and test session as independent variables. The results revealed high intersession reliability for RTD100 in knee extension (ICC 0.849-0.961) and flexion (ICC 0.835-0.944) across repetitions and selection criteria. Three repetitions were sufficient to optimize intersession reliability and measured values of knee extensor RTD. Assessment of knee flexor RTD required five repetitions to optimize reliability for RTD50 (ICC ≥ 0.700) and six repetitions to optimize absolute measured values of RTD100. Selection criteria based on peak RTD100 ensured optimal reliability and absolute RTD measurements for both peak50, RTD50 and RTD100. The assessment of knee flexion requires more repetitions than knee extension to ensure reproducible early-phase RTD outcomes.

Indexed as

Isometric ContractionKnee JointMuscle, SkeletalTorqueAdultFemaleHumansKneeMaleReproducibility of ResultsYoung Adultnumber of repetitionsrate of force developmenttest–retest reliabilitytrial selection criteria

Identifiers

PMID40095384
PMCPMC11912522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.