ArticleReproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)2025
Deeper Trophoblastic Invasion and More-Promotive Vascular Remodeling in Tubal Isthmic Pregnancy Compared with Ampullary Pregnancy: A Retrospective Clinicopathological Study.
Article in Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and Validation of a Machine Learning-Based Clinical Model for Predicting Rupture in Ectopic Pregnancy: A Web-Based Nomogram Approach.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To explore clinical and pathological characteristics of tubal isthmic pregnancy. A single-center, retrospective clinicopathological cohort study was conducted in women diagnosed with tubal pregnancy that underwent salpingectomy in International Peace Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital from January 2018 to April 2023. A total of 598 eligible women with tubal pregnancy were included in the analysis, including 75 women with isthmic pregnancy and 523 women with ampullary pregnancy. Among women with isthmic pregnancy, 29 (38.67%) had trophoblastic infiltration into the muscular layer, while 46 (61.33%) had infiltration into the serosal layer. Meanwhile 66 (12.62%) women, 258 (49.33%) women, and 199 (38.05%) women had trophoblastic infiltration into the mucosal layer, muscular layer, and serosal layer of the ampullary pregnancy, respectively. The study found that women with isthmic pregnancy had enhanced trophoblastic activity, deeper vascular remodeling, increased trophoblastic infiltration into the deep wall of the tube, higher serum beta subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) levels, and a higher probability of clinical manifestations. Additionally compared with ampullary pregnancy, the occurrence of isthmic pregnancy was positively correlated with salpingitis isthmica nodosa (AOR = 3.62, 95% CI 1.45-9.00, P < 0.01), and negatively correlated with the presence of chronic tubal inflammation (AOR = 0.24, 95% CI 0.09-0.64, P < 0.01). Salpingitis isthmica nodosa, not chronic inflammation of the fallopian tubes, may be a risk factor for isthmic pregnancy. Compared to ampullary pregnancy, isthmic pregnancy exhibits a more profound trophoblastic vascular remodeling of the fallopian tube and a greater tendency to infiltrate the deep layers of the tubal wall. These characteristics render it more concealed and perilous, underscoring the importance of early recognition and diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.