Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40095321›Full record

ArticleJournal of computational neuroscience2025

Neural waves and computation in a neural net model III: preplay, working memory and bursts.

S A Selesnick

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computational neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

S A SelesnickMathematics and Statistics, University of Missouri - St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, 63121, USA. selesnick@mindspring.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence in favor of an earlier conjecture, namely that the low frequency autonomic regime of neural waves acts as a governing or operating system, processing incoming stimuli in various ways for the purposes of conducting computations, is presented in the context of our network model. The rôle of this low frequency regime in the implementation of preplay compares favorably with recent experimental findings in mice. This is followed by a discussion and analysis of three problems arising from considerations of Working Memory processes. Namely, distinguishability, garbage collection and distractor avoidance. The rôle of inhibitory bursts arises spontaneously in the last two scenarios.

Indexed as

Memory, Short-TermModels, NeurologicalNerve NetNeural Networks, ComputerNeuronsAction PotentialsAnimalsComputer SimulationHumansMiceInhibitory burstsNeural netNeural wavesPreplayWorking memory

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.