Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40095295›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2025

Gynecology residents' preparedness to perform standard gynecological procedures autonomously: A national survey among French residents and faculty.

Laura Puroski, Sophia Braund, Olivia Guerin, Eric Verspyck, Patrice Crochet, Salma Touleimat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Gynecology residents' preparedness to perform standard gynecological procedures autonomously: A national survey among French residents and faculty.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Laura PuroskiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Charles Nicolle Hospital, University of Rouen, Rouen, France.
Sophia BraundDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Charles Nicolle Hospital, University of Rouen, Rouen, France.
Olivia GuerinDepartment of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, CHU Rouen, Rouen, France.
Eric VerspyckDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Charles Nicolle Hospital, University of Rouen, Rouen, France.
Patrice CrochetDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Charles Nicolle Hospital, University of Rouen, Rouen, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7618-653X
Salma TouleimatDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Charles Nicolle Hospital, University of Rouen, Rouen, France.

Funding

Université de Rouen
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to explore the perceptions of French residents and academic teachers regarding residents' autonomy during training and their preparedness to perform standard gynecological procedures.

methodsA national survey of French obstetrics and gynecology residents and their academic teachers was conducted using an online questionnaire distributed in 2023, which gathered opinions on the level of autonomy granted in the operating room for performing standard gynecological procedures and perceptions of preparedness upon graduation. The survey also examined perceptions on the impact of factors that improve surgical autonomy.

resultsThe response rate was 43% (510/1197) for residents and 31% (42/137) for academic teachers. The opinions of residents and academic teachers regarding residents' surgical preparedness by graduation were similar, except for vaginal hysterectomy (30% vs. 57%, P < 0.001). Residents were thought prepared to perform hysteroscopy and adnexal surgery by laparoscopy by >90% of respondents. Regarding hysterectomy, opinions varied depending on the approach: the only approach for which more than two-thirds of residents (67%) were thought to be prepared by gradation was laparoscopy. Regarding factors promoting surgical autonomy, 99% of residents and 97% of teachers considered case volume and coaching quality essential. Only 37% of residents and 55% of teachers deemed the introduction of summative assessment relevant.

conclusionFrench residents and academic teachers reported adequate preparedness for hysteroscopy and adnexal surgery. There were concerns regarding preparedness for more complex surgeries, particularly laparotomic and vaginal hysterectomy. These findings underscore the need for revisions in training methods and residency objectives.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceFaculty, MedicalGynecologic Surgical ProceduresGynecologyInternship and ResidencyProfessional AutonomyAdultFemaleFranceHumansMaleObstetricsSurveys and Questionnaireseducationgynecologysurgical techniquestraining

Identifiers

PMID40095295
PMCPMC12255914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.