Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40095260›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2025

A novel comparative evaluation of multiplex PCR panels for gastrointestinal pathogen detection: Seegene Allplex™ vs. Luminex NxTAG

Laura Seijas-Pereda, Ana Martín, Raquel Menchero, Carlos Rescalvo-Casas, Marcos Hernando-Gozalo, Juan Cuadros-González, Ramón Pérez-Tanoira

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Comparison of the LuminexJournal of medical microbiology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Laura Seijas-PeredaDepartment of Biomedicine and Biotechnology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, Spain. laura.seijas@edu.uah.es.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9360-7159
Ana MartínDiasorin Iberia S.A, Alcobendas, Spain.
Raquel MencheroDiasorin Iberia S.A, Alcobendas, Spain.
Carlos Rescalvo-CasasDepartment of Biomedicine and Biotechnology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3745-6661
Marcos Hernando-GozaloDepartment of Microbiology, Príncipe de Asturias University Hospital, Alcalá de Henares, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2838-7270
Juan Cuadros-GonzálezDepartment of Biomedicine and Biotechnology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4098-4377
Ramón Pérez-TanoiraDepartment of Biomedicine and Biotechnology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9816-3208

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAccurate and rapid diagnosis of gastrointestinal infections is essential for effective patient management. This study compared the diagnostic performance of two multiplex PCR panels- the Seegene Allplex™ Gastrointestinal Panels (Seegene, Seoul, Korea) and the Luminex NxTAG

methodsA total of 196 stool samples, collected from patients at a Spanish hospital during 2023, were analyzed using both assays through prospective and retrospective approaches. The performance of each test was assessed based on Positive Percentage Agreement (PPA), Negative Percentage Agreement (NPA), and overall agreement. Discrepancies between methods were resolved with a third confirmatory technique when available.

resultsBoth assays demonstrated high overall concordance, with NPA values consistently above 95% and overall Kappa values exceeding 0.8 for most pathogens. The average PPA was greater than 89% for nearly all targets; however, lower agreement was observed for Cryptosporidium spp. (86.6%). Notably, discrepancies were primarily observed for certain pathogens, such as Salmonella spp. and Cryptosporidium spp., highlighting the diagnostic challenges associated with these targets.

conclusionTo our knowledge, this is the first study to compare the novel Luminex NxTAG

Indexed as

FecesGastrointestinal DiseasesMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesMultiplex Polymerase Chain ReactionAdultAgedChildChild, PreschoolCryptosporidiumFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityHealthcare impactLaboratory diagnosticsMolecular assayPositive percentage agreement and negative percentage agreementSyndromic testing

Identifiers

PMID40095260
PMCPMC12116839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.