ArticleJournal of community genetics2025
"Hope at a better chance": perspectives on genetic counseling and testing among black individuals with prostate cancer.
Article in Journal of community genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Black individuals have the highest prostate cancer (PCa) incidence and mortality rates of any racial or ethnic group. Racial disparities persist in the understanding and uptake of genetics services, while the perspectives of Black individuals with PCa regarding genetic counseling and germline genetic testing for inherited cancer risk (GC/GT) remains understudied. This qualitative study explored attitudes, facilitators, and barriers to awareness, interest, and uptake of GC/GT among Black individuals with PCa. Eight individuals who self-identified as African American and/or Black with a personal history of PCa participated in individual telephone interviews using a semi-structured interview guide. Interview transcripts were analyzed using both an inductive and deductive coding approach, constant comparison, and selective coding. Five major themes were identified: (1) uncertainty surrounding personal relevance of GC/GT, (2) family influence and impact of GC/GT, (3) healthcare providers and institutions as gatekeepers of GC/GT, (4) community identity, influence, and impact of GC/GT, and (5) systemic barriers to GC/GT exemplify larger structural constraints. A key finding was the influence of community, a collective identity among Black individuals and a desire to benefit the Black community, in motivating research participation and pursuit of GC/GT to lessen racial disparities in PCa. Individual, interpersonal, institutional, community, and structural factors are both barriers and facilitators to awareness, interest, and uptake of GC/GT. Multilevel interventions such as communicating personal, familial, and community implications of GC/GT, improving patient-provider relationships and genetics education, and addressing systemic barriers are necessary to increase efficacy, utility, and equity in GC/GT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.