ArticleDiscover oncology2025
Identification of GJC1 as a novel diagnostic marker for papillary thyroid carcinoma using weighted gene co-expression network analysis and machine learning algorithm.
Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond the gap: moonlighting functions of connexins in cancer.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2026Review
- Developing a prognostic signature with cancer-associated fibroblasts for predicting the prognosis and immune landscape of prostate cancer.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Identification of Potential Biomarkers and Drugs for Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma Using Computational Analysis and Molecular Docking.Current medicinal chemistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe incidence of thyroid papillary carcinoma (PTC) is increasing annually, causing both physical and psychological pressure on patients. Therefore, early recognition and specific interventions for PTC are crucial. The objective of this study is to explore novel diagnostic marker and precise intervention targets for PTC.
methodsBased on a weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA), relevant datasets from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) databases were collected. Enrichment analysis was performed on differentially expressed genes (DEGs) using Gene Ontology (GO), Disease Ontology (DO), Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG), and Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA). Subsequently, three machine learning algorithms Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO), Support Vector Machine Recursive Feature Elimination (SVM-RFE), and Random Forest (RF) were used to identify the core genes. Finally, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to analyze the clinical diagnostic value of the core genes.
resultsWe found, in total, 11,194 DEGs derived the TCGA and GEO datasets, that are primarily enriched in extracellular matrix (ECM) and inflammation related pathways, such as an ECM receptor interaction, cell adhesion molecules (CAMs), Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) signaling, and nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain (NOD) like receptor signaling pathways. Further analysis of the core genes, identified by the protein-protein interaction network, using three machine learning algorithms discovered three intersecting genes GJC1, KLHL4, and NOL4. Of which, GJC1 has good clinical diagnostic ability, which was verified using both the GEO (area under the ROC curve (AUC) = .982) and TCGA databases (AUC = .840).
conclusionsGJC1 is highly expressed in PTC. Therefore, it is considered as a potential biomarker and is expected to become a new target for PTC gene therapy. However, it still needs to be supported and verified by more clinical data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.