ArticleDiscover oncology2025
Development and validation of a disulfidptosis-related prognostic model for colorectal cancer using multi-omics analysis.
Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Disulfidptosis: Mechanisms, evidence boundaries, and translational opportunities.Redox biology · 2026Review
- Machine learning-driven transcriptomic and single-cell profiling of programed cell death patterns in colon cancer.Science progressArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to integrate multi-omic and clinical data concerning disulfidptosis-related genes (DRGs) to facilitate molecular typing and prognosis in colorectal cancer (CRC). Public databases provided CRC transcriptome and clinical data, enabling differential expression, genomic analyses, pathway enrichment, survival analysis, and subtyping based on the expression levels of 15 DRGs identified in published studies. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between subtypes were identified to create a disulfidptosis prognostic model using LASSO and Cox regression analyses. This model was evaluated by comparing risk scores, survival curves, cellular infiltration, and drug sensitivity between high- and low-risk groups. Analyses revealed differential expression, mutations, and copy number variations (CNV) in DRGs in CRC. Survival analysis demonstrated significant prognostic differences among DRG expression subtypes. GSVA and ssGSEA highlighted DRGs' regulatory roles in CRC. DEGs identified between DRG expression subtypes led to the classification into subtypes A and B. A disulfidptosis prognostic model, including genes VSIG4, SCG2, INHBB, DDC, CXCL13, KLK10, CXCL10, and CCL11A, was developed to stratify patients into high- and low-risk groups. This model displayed strong predictive capability (AUC = 0.700) and calibration. The risk score was also strongly associated with immune cell infiltration, stromal cell score, and stem cell index in the CRC tumor microenvironment. Drug sensitivity analysis indicated that high-risk samples were more responsive to most medications. We established a robust disulfidptosis prognostic model for CRC through comprehensive multi-omics analysis. Our findings provide valuable insights into the role of DRGs in CRC progression and disease management, presenting an important resource for further research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.