Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40095099›Full record

ArticleArchives of dermatological research2025

A multimodal approach to acne mechanica associated to medical face masks using clinical examination, fluorescent photography, and in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy.

Stefana Cretu, Denis Iorga, Mihai Dascalu, Carmen Maria Salavastru

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of dermatological research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Stefana Cretu"Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania. stefana_spiridon@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1127-5726
Denis IorgaDepartment of Computer Science, National University of Science and Technology Politehnica, Bucharest, Romania.
Mihai DascaluDepartment of Computer Science, National University of Science and Technology Politehnica, Bucharest, Romania.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4815-9227
Carmen Maria Salavastru"Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With yet unclear pathogenesis, acne mechanica associated to medical face masks(MFM) gained increased attention during the COVID-19 pandemic. Between November 2021-January 2022 we conducted an exploratory, cross-sectional study evaluating the differences between the glabella and cheek-chin junction using clinical examination, fluorescent photography (FP), videodermatoscopy and in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM). Medical doctors from our country and 6th year medical students were invited. Participants self-identified as consistent MFM users during work hours. We analysed 19,432 images from 14 consecutive subjects, 11 females, 3 males, mean age,29.93 years (SD = 4.69). Clinical examination revealed more inflammatory lesions on the cheeks and chin (+ 9.35;95%CI + 2.31to + 16.39;d = 0.76, P =.01). FP considered ultraviolet red fluorescing spots(UVRFs) from the glabella and the cheek-chin junction, with significantly more spots in the former (+ 5.43;95%CI + 2.64to + 8.20; d = 1.12; P =.001). The average area in mm

Indexed as

Acne VulgarisCOVID-19MasksAdultCross-Sectional StudiesDermoscopyFemaleHumansMaleMicroscopy, ConfocalPhotographyPhysical ExaminationSARS-CoV-2SkinYoung AdultAcneAcne mechanicaFluorescent photographyMedical face masksMultimodalReflectance confocal microscopy

Identifiers

PMID40095099
PMCPMC11913915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.