ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2025
Artificial Intelligence-Driven Detection of LASIK Using Corneal Optical Coherence Tomography Maps.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: To train and validate a convolutional neural network (CNN) to detect the history of laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) surgeries using corneal optical coherence tomography (OCT) maps. Methods: Five corneal OCT maps (pachymetry, epithelial thickness, posterior mean curvature, anterior axial power, and anterior stroma reflectance) were utilized as the input of a lightweight CNN model. OCT scans of healthy volunteers and patients who had undergone myopic or hyperopic LASIK were included. Repeated fivefold cross-validation was used to train and evaluate the proposed CNN. In addition, a separate group of post-LASIK participants, who were not included in the cross-validation, was used for out-of-sample testing to assess the CNN model performance. Results: In the cross-validation, the proposed CNN model achieved an overall balanced accuracy of 90.2% ± 3.6% with 93.5% ± 5.2% sensitivity and 97.8% ± 1.7% area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) in detecting myopic LASIK and 90.2% ± 5.8% sensitivity and 98.2% ± 1.9% AUC in identifying the hyperopic LASIK. In the out-of-sample test, all eyes were classified correctively. Conclusions: The lightweight CNN model with corneal OCT maps provides a useful tool for detecting LASIK history. Translational Relevance: Artificial intelligence-assisted OCT may offer better management for patients with LASIK history who need cataract surgeries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.