ArticleJAMA network open2025
Genomic Screening at a Single Health System.
Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Opportunistic Genomic Screening for Familial Hypercholesterolemia to Improve Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2026Trial
- Recommendations for return of secondary genomic findings in observational cohort studies.Nature genetics · 2026Review
- Evaluating the Acceptability of Virtual Preventive Genetic Counseling Supporting Adult Primary Care Practices.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- A Genome-First Study of Familial Hypercholesterolemia Comparing African and European Ancestry Individuals.Circulation · 2026Article
- Uptake and timing of risk-reducing gynecologic surgery among individuals with Lynch syndrome identified via population screening.Familial cancer · 2026Article
- MODY Is Prevalent in Later-Onset Diabetes and Has Potential for Targeted Therapy but Is Challenging to Identify.Diabetes · 2026Article
- North Carolina primary care provider perspectives on expanded genomic screening in children.BMC medical genomics · 2026Article
- Article
- Feasibility and outcomes of the DNA Screen nationwide adult genomic screening pilot.Nature health · 2026Article
- Hereditary Hemochromatosis and Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy as Tier 1 Genomic Conditions: Implications for Adult Population Genomic Screening.Public health genomics · 2026Article
- The global cancer crisis: a review of growing burden, deepening inequality and initiatives for prevention and early detection.Ecancermedicalscience · 2026Review
- eConsent vs traditional consent among prospective biobank participants: a randomized study within a study trial.npj digital public health · 2026Article
- A scalable approach for genomic-first rare disorder detection in a healthcare-based population.American journal of human genetics · 2025Article
- eConsent vs. Traditional Consent Among Prospective Biobank Participants: A Randomized Trial.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Advancing the science of genomic learning healthcare systems.Learning health systems · 2025Article
- Pseudohypoxia caused by germline genetic alterations in the VHL gene is associated with increased diabetes and cardiovascular risk: a UK biobank study.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2025Article
- Article
- Performance of recommended management among pediatric patients identified through genomic screening.Translational behavioral medicine · 2025Observational
- Elective genomic screening: results of the implementation of a whole genome sequencing program at a medical check-up unit in Spain.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Completion of the Human Genome Project prompted predictions that genomics would transform medicine, including through genomic screening that identifies potentially medically actionable findings that could prevent disease, detect it earlier, or treat it better. However, genomic screening remains anchored in research and largely unavailable as part of routine care. Objective: To summarize 11 years of experience with genomic screening and explore the landscape of genomic screening efforts. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study was based in Geisinger's MyCode Community Health Initiative, a genomic screening program in a rural Pennsylvania health care system in which patient-participants exomes are analyzed. Main Outcomes and Measures: Genomic screen-positive rates were evaluated and stratified by condition type (cancer, cardiovascular, other) and US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Tier 1 designation. The proportion of participants previously unaware of their genomic result was assessed. Other large-scale population-based genomic screening efforts with genomic results disclosure were compiled from public resources. Results: A total of 354 957 patients participated in Geisinger's genomic screening program (median [IQR] age, 54 [36-69] years; 194 037 [59.7%] assigned female sex at birth). As of June 2024, 175 500 participants had exome sequencing available for analysis, and 5934 participants (3.4%) had a pathogenic variant in 81 genes known to increase risk for disease. Between 2013 and July 2024, 5119 results were disclosed to 5052 eligible participants, with 2267 (44.2%) associated with risk for cardiovascular disease, 2031 (39.7%) with risk for cancer, and 821 (16.0%) with risk for other conditions. Most results (3040 [59.4%]) were in genes outside of those with a CDC Tier 1 designation. Nearly 90% of participants (4425 [87.6%]) were unaware of their genomic risk prior to disclosure. In a survey of large-scale biobanks with genomic and electronic health record (EHR) data, only 25.0% (6 of 24) disclosed potentially actionable genomic results. Conclusions and Relevance: In this large, genomics-informed cohort study from a single health system, 1 in 30 participants had a potentially actionable genomic finding. However, nearly 90% were unaware of their risk prior to screening, demonstrating the utility of genomic screening in identifying at-risk individuals. Most large-scale biobanks with genomic and EHR data did not return genomic results with potential medical relevance, missing opportunities to significantly improve genomic risk ascertainment for these individuals and to perform longitudinal studies of clinical and implementation outcomes in diverse settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.