Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40094661›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2025

Mailed Outreach and Patient Navigation for Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Rural Medicaid Enrollees: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.

Gloria D Coronado, Amanda F Petrik, Michael C Leo, Jennifer Coury, Robert Durr, Brittany Badicke, Jamie H Thompson, Anna C Edelmann, Melinda M Davis

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04890054 (Screening More Patients for CRC Through Adapting and Refining Targeted Evidence-Based Interventions in Rural Settings), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04890054 nacompletednot on this map

Screening More Patients for CRC Through Adapting and Refining Targeted Evidence-Based Interventions in Rural Settings (SMARTER CRC)

TypeinterventionalSponsorOHSU Knight Cancer InstituteRan2021 to 2024Enrolled5,696ConditionsColorectal CarcinomaArmsFecal Immunochemical Test, Interview, Patient Navigation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Tailored interventions to address determinants of practice.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026
    Pooled it
  4. Facilitation of Health Plan-Clinic Partnerships to Improve Colorectal Cancer Screening for Rural Medicaid Enrollees: A Qualitative Study.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2026
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Appointments aren't Access: The Hidden Work of Getting Care.Journal of primary care & community health
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Gloria D CoronadoUniversity of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson.
Amanda F PetrikKaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon.
Michael C LeoKaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon.
Jennifer CouryOregon Rural Practice-Based Research Network, Portland.
Robert DurrOregon Rural Practice-Based Research Network, Portland.
Brittany BadickeOregon Rural Practice-Based Research Network, Portland.
Jamie H ThompsonKaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon.
Anna C EdelmannKaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon.
Melinda M DavisOregon Rural Practice-Based Research Network, Portland.

Funding

Oregon Clinical and Translational Research Institute - The National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C)UL1TR002369 · NCATS · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Cynthia D Morris, Christopher G. Slatore · 2017 to 2026
$78.4M
Smarter CRC Supplement for ACCSIS Patient NavigationUH3CA244298 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI CORONADO, GLORIA D, DAVIS, MELINDA MARIE · 2020 to 2023
$4.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002369NCI NIH HHS UH3 CA244298
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Approximately 60 million adults live in rural regions of the US, which historically have low rates of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening and follow-up. Rural residents enrolled in Medicaid have particularly low CRC screening and follow-up rates. Objective: To determine the effectiveness and implementation of a collaborative Medicaid health plan-clinic program of mailed fecal immunochemical test (FIT) outreach and patient navigation to colonoscopy following an abnormal FIT result when implemented in rural clinics as part of standard care. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cluster randomized clinical trial was conducted at 28 rural clinic units in Oregon affiliated with 3 Medicaid health plans. The clinics were randomized to the intervention (n = 14) or to usual care (n = 14). Participants were Medicaid enrollees (aged 50-75 years) due for CRC screening. The intervention was delivered from May 11, 2021, through June 4, 2022, and analyses were performed from June 2023 through September 2024. Intervention: The stepwise intervention involved (1) mailed FIT outreach and (2) patient navigation to colonoscopy following an abnormal FIT result. Implementation support included practice facilitation, training, collaborative learning, and patient tracking tools. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary effectiveness outcome was completion of any CRC screening within 6 months of eligibility determination. An additional effectiveness outcome was follow-up colonoscopy completion within 6 months of an abnormal FIT result. Implementation was measured as (1) the proportion of intervention-eligible enrollees who were mailed an FIT and who were sent an advance notification or reminder and (2) the proportion with an abnormal FIT result who were offered patient navigation. Results: This study included 5614 Medicaid enrollees (2613 in intervention clinics and 3001 in usual care clinics). Enrollees had a mean (SD) age of 58.2 (5.5) years; most (4940 [88.0%]) were aged 50 to 64 years. A total of 2948 enrollees (52.5%) were female, 325 (6.2%) were Hispanic and 3774 (67.2%) were White, and 4457 (79.4%) lived in rural regions. Compared with Medicaid enrollees in usual care clinics, enrollees in intervention clinics had a higher adjusted 6-month proportion of any CRC screening completion (11.8% vs 4.5%; difference, 7.3 [95% CI, 5.3-9.2] percentage points). Implementation was 100% (all 1489 intervention-eligible enrollees) for mailed FIT outreach, 88.5% for advance notification, 78.1% for reminders, and 57.9% for patient navigation. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cluster randomized clinical trial of rural clinics, mailed FIT outreach and patient navigation boosted participation in CRC screening among Medicaid enrollees. More efforts are needed to address low participation in both FIT testing and follow-up colonoscopy. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04890054.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerMedicaidPatient NavigationRural PopulationAgedColonoscopyFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedOccult BloodOregonPostal ServiceUnited States

Identifiers

PMID40094661
PMCPMC11915063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.