Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40094631›Full record

ArticleThe Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry2025

It is time to reassess reporting of electroconvulsive therapy data in New Zealand: A 17-year retrospective analysis of treatment data from Waikato.

Robert M Lundin, Savani Kannangara, Matthew Jenkins, Teresa Carroll, Kathrine Wakefield, Colin Patrick, Moloud Abdar, Abbas Khosravi, Colleen Loo, Michael Berk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Robert M LundinInstitute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation (IMPACT), School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5992-2822
Savani KannangaraPeter Rothwell Academic Centre, The University of Auckland, Waikato Hospital, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Matthew JenkinsPeter Rothwell Academic Centre, The University of Auckland, Waikato Hospital, Hamilton, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-1534-8814
Teresa CarrollMental Health and Addiction Services, Te Whatu Ora, Waikato, New Zealand.
Kathrine WakefieldMental Health and Addiction Services, Te Whatu Ora, Waikato, New Zealand.
Colin PatrickMental Health and Addiction Services, Te Whatu Ora, Waikato, New Zealand.ORCID 0009-0002-4658-100X
Moloud AbdarInstitute for Intelligent Systems Research and Innovation (IISRI), Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Abbas KhosraviInstitute for Intelligent Systems Research and Innovation (IISRI), Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Colleen LooDiscipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, School of Clinical Medicine, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3267-0554
Michael BerkInstitute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation (IMPACT), School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5554-6946

Funding

NHMRC Leadership Investigator Grant 1195651NHMRC Senior Principal Research Fellowship and Leadership 3 Investigator Grant 1156072NHMRC Senior Principal Research Fellowship and Leadership 3 Investigator Grant 2017131
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe New Zealand Government has provided brief annual reports on electroconvulsive therapy treatment since 2004. Despite this, only limited information is made available to clinicians to guide clinical improvement and refine guidelines. Beyond an audit from Otago detailing 10 years of electroconvulsive therapy treatments, limited information is available about electroconvulsive therapy treatments in New Zealand. This paper reports on the use of electroconvulsive therapy over the past 17 years in one New Zealand District Health Board.

methodsIt covers 7126 treatments for 333 patients between 2004 and 2020.

resultsDespite an increasing number of treatments, there has been no per capita growth when corrected for the population. Despite criticism for the disproportionate use of electroconvulsive therapy in women, treatment equity for men and women has been evidenced over the latter 3 years. The majority of treatments were given under voluntary consent, even among patients admitted under the Mental Health Act. Clinical practice is moving towards bifrontal treatment over other electrode placements in response to clinical guidance.

conclusionWhile COVID-19 had broad impacts across healthcare services, it has not led to an overall change in treatments. There was, however, a noticeable shift towards more psychotic disorders treated during the pandemic. This study also provides data that Māori and Pacific Islanders are accessing electroconvulsive therapy, though rates of electroconvulsive therapy usage are still lesser on a proportional population basis. Conclusions are provided to improve national data collection and reporting standards.

Indexed as

COVID-19Electroconvulsive TherapyAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNew ZealandRetrospective Studieselectroconvulsive therapyElectroconvulsive therapyneurostimulationNew Zealand

Identifiers

PMID40094631
PMCPMC12022368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.