Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40094607›Full record

ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2025

A Meta-Analysis of Response Strategies and Interfering Factors of Kin Recognition in Plants.

Xin-Xin Xia, Shaobin Yan, Peng Wang, Chui-Hua Kong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xin-Xin XiaCollege of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Shaobin YanInstitute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China.
Peng WangInstitute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0629-8835
Chui-Hua KongCollege of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8405-3083

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 31672040
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conspecific plants exhibit morphological and biochemical plasticity in response to genetic relatedness in varying environments. However, the response strategies and factors influencing kin recognition in plants remain unclear. Meta-analysis is an approach to synthesize the effect size of plant-plant and plant-environment interactions. Here, we present the first case of a meta-analysis for response strategies and interfering factors in relatedness-mediated plant-plant interactions. We synthesized the effect of kin recognition on plant performance and environmental factors, based on 104 studies with 4045 cases. As a result, we found that kin recognition reduces root biomass, root length, root-shoot ratio, and lateral root number, lowering belowground competition. Furthermore, kin cooperation enhances aboveground light acquisition by increasing leaf area and boosts reproductive success by increasing seed biomass. The kinship effects are significantly influenced by both biotic (e.g., root interactions, kinship coefficient

Indexed as

beneficial plant–plant interactionsbiotic and abiotic factorsconspecific cooperationgenetic relatednesskin discriminationkinship effectplant performance

Identifiers

PMID40094607
PMCPMC11901976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.