ArticleGigaScience2025
NanoMnT: an STR analysis tool for Oxford Nanopore sequencing data driven by a comprehensive analysis of error profile in STR regions.
Article in GigaScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Toward the clinical application of long-read sequencing in repeat-expansion disorders.Nature genetics · 2026Review
- Genome-wide detection and clinical prioritization of tandem repeat outliers using long-read sequencing.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Analysis of microsatellite instability intensity in single-cell resolution with scMnT reveals tumor heterogeneity in colorectal cancer.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Computational tools for tandem repeat detection using long-read sequencing.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- PhIP-Seq: unveiling the complexity of antibody repertoires in health and disease.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Identification of cell-type-specific, transcriptionally active transposable elements using long-read RNA-sequencing data-based comprehensive annotation.Genomics & informatics · 2025Article
- NanoMnT: an STR analysis tool for Oxford Nanopore sequencing data driven by a comprehensive analysis of error profile in STR regions.GigaScience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Oxford Nanopore Technology (ONT) sequencing is a third-generation sequencing technology that enables cost-effective long-read sequencing, with broad applications in biological research. However, its high sequencing error rate in low-complexity regions hampers its applications in short tandem repeat (STR)-related research. To address this, we generated a comprehensive STR error profile of ONT by analyzing publicly available Nanopore sequencing datasets. We show that the sequencing error rate is influenced not only by STR length but also by the repeat unit and the flanking sequences of STR regions. Interestingly, certain flanking sequences were associated with higher sequencing accuracy, suggesting that certain STR loci are more suitable for Nanopore sequencing compared to other loci. While base quality scores of substitution errors within the STR regions were lower than those of correctly sequenced bases, such patterns were not observed for indel errors. Furthermore, choosing the most recent basecaller version and using the super accuracy model significantly improved STR sequencing accuracy. Finally, we present NanoMnT, a lightweight Python tool that corrects STR sequencing errors in sequencing data and estimates STR allele sizes. NanoMnT leverages the characteristics of ONT when estimating STR allele size and exhibits superior results for 1-bp- and 2-bp repeat STR compared to existing tools. By integrating our findings, we improved STR allele estimation accuracy for Ax10 repeats from 55% to 78% and up to 85% when excluding loci with unfavorable flanking sequences. Using NanoMnT, we present the utility of our findings by identifying microsatellite instability status in cancer sequencing data. NanoMnT is publicly available at https://github.com/18parkky/NanoMnT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.