Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40094483›Full record

ArticleChemical research in toxicology2025

Nicotine Dosimetry in Evaluating Electronic Cigarettes Compared to Cigarette Smoking: Implications for Tobacco Regulatory Science.

Neal L Benowitz, Hao-Yuan Yang, Peyton Jacob, Gideon St Helen

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical research in toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Neal L BenowitzResearch Program in Clinical Pharmacology, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, Box 1237, San Francisco, California 94143, United States.
Hao-Yuan YangResearch Program in Clinical Pharmacology, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, Box 1237, San Francisco, California 94143, United States.
Peyton JacobResearch Program in Clinical Pharmacology, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, Box 1237, San Francisco, California 94143, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3366-2775
Gideon St HelenResearch Program in Clinical Pharmacology, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, Box 1237, San Francisco, California 94143, United States.

Funding

Research Support CoreP30DA012393 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI JACOB, PEYTON, JONES, REESE T. · 1999 to 2024
$17.1M
Clinical Pharmacology of Electronic CigarettesR01DA039264 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BENOWITZ, NEAL L · 2015 to 2021
$4.5M
NIDA NIH HHS P30 DA012393NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA039264
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The delivery and systemic absorption of nicotine are important for assessing the potential safety and efficacy of novel inhaled nicotine delivery devices. We describe an experimental approach for examining systemic nicotine intake, looking at individual variability, comparing JUUL electronic cigarettes and cigarette smoking, and comparing standardized puffing and ad libitum use. Fourteen cigarette smokers who were infrequent e-cigarette users vaped JUUL or smoked cigarettes, both in a standardized session (ten 3.5 s puffs over 5 min) and in a 4 h ad libitum use session. Plasma nicotine concentrations were measured, and using sex and body weight-based population nicotine clearance predictions, systemic nicotine dose was estimated in each session. The pharmacokinetically (PK)-estimated nicotine dose in the standardized session averaged 0.55 mg (range 0.16-0.82) for JUUL and 1.15 mg (range 0.35-4.56) for cigarette smoking. The PK-estimated dose with ad libitum use averaged 4.1 mg (range 0.4-9.5) for JUUL and 5.0 mg (range 1.5-15) for smoking (average 3.4 cigarettes). Within individual correlations, comparing PK-estimated dose for JUUL use with standardized vs ad libitum session was weak (

Indexed as

Cigarette SmokingElectronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsNicotineAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultNicotine

Identifiers

PMID40094483
PMCPMC12015950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.