Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40094461›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomechanical engineering2025

Dynamic Rigidity Control for Supportive Sheaths in Endovascular Procedures.

Michael Y Qiu, Vinay Chandrasekaran, Chase M Hartquist, Halle R Lowe, Charles B Suskin, Sheridan Lee, Juan Becerra-Garcia, Jin Vivian Lee, DeVaughn B Rucker, Michelle R Connor and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomechanical engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Michael Y QiuDivision of Neurotechnology, Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110;NSF Science and Technology Center for Engineering Mechanobiology, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130.
Vinay ChandrasekaranDivision of Neurotechnology, Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110;NSF Science and Technology Center for Engineering Mechanobiology, Department of Computer Science & Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130.
Chase M HartquistDivision of Neurotechnology, Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110;NSF Science and Technology Center for Engineering Mechanobiology, Department of Mechanical Engineering & Materials Science, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130.
Halle R LoweDivision of Neurotechnology, Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110;NSF Science and Technology Center for Engineering Mechanobiology, Department of Mechanical Engineering & Materials Science, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130.
Charles B SuskinDivision of Neurotechnology, Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110;NSF Science and Technology Center for Engineering Mechanobiology, Department of Mechanical Engineering & Materials Science, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130.ORCID 0009-0004-9573-453X
Sheridan LeeDivision of Neurotechnology, Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110;NSF Science and Technology Center for Engineering Mechanobiology, Department of Mechanical Engineering & Materials Science, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130.
Juan Becerra-GarciaDivision of Neurotechnology, Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110;NSF Science and Technology Center for Engineering Mechanobiology, Department of Mechanical Engineering & Materials Science, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130.
Jin Vivian LeeDivision of Neurotechnology, Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110;Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130.ORCID 0000-0002-8961-0125
DeVaughn B RuckerCVISE, The Center Cardiovascular Innovation in Surgery and Engineering, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110;NSF Science and Technology Center for Engineering Mechanobiology, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130.
Michelle R ConnorCVISE, The Center Cardiovascular Innovation in Surgery and Engineering, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110.
Sophia R PyeatteCVISE, The Center Cardiovascular Innovation in Surgery and Engineering, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110.
Mohamed S ZaghloulSection of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110.
Santiago Elizondo BenedettoSection of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110.
Eric C LeuthardtDivision of Neurotechnology, Department of Neurological Surgery, CVISE, The Center Cardiovascular Innovation in Surgery and Engineering, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110.
Mohamed A ZayedDivision of Surgical Sciences, Division of Molecular Cell Biology, Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, CVISE, The Center Cardiovascular Innovation in Surgery and Engineering, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110; NSF Science and Technology Center for Engineering Mechanobiology, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130.
Joshua W OsbunDivision of Neurotechnology, Department of Neurological Surgery, CVISE, The Center for Cardiovascular Innovation in Surgery and Engineering, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110.
Guy M GeninDivision of Neurotechnology, Department of Neurological Surgery, CVISE, The Center Cardiovascular Innovation in Surgery and Engineering, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110;NSF Science and Technology Center for Engineering Mechanobiology, Department of Mechanical Engineering & Materials Science, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130.

Funding

National Science Foundation CMMI 1548571NIH HHS R41HL150963, R42HL150963, T32HL170959
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endovascular procedures require sheaths with contradictory mechanical properties: flexibility for navigation through tortuous vessels, yet rigidity for device delivery. Current approaches rely on multiple device exchanges, increasing procedural time, and complication risks. Here we present a novel endovascular sheath design scheme with dynamically controllable flexural rigidity along its entire length. The device incorporates axially aligned metal string arrays between inner and outer lumens, enabling transition between flexible and rigid states through suction actuation. Three-point bend testing demonstrated that actuation increases flexural rigidity from the range associated with diagnostic catheters to that associated with support sheaths. In simulated contralateral access procedures, the device reduced access time to 1/3 of the time required when using conventional approaches. in vivo porcine studies validated the sheath's ability to navigate tortuous anatomy in its flexible state and successfully support advancement of increasingly rigid therapeutic devices when actuated. Technology enables single-sheath delivery of treatment, potentially reducing procedural complexity, decreasing complication rates, and improving patient outcomes across various endovascular interventions. This design represents a promising approach to combining catheter and sheath design that benefits both peripheral and neurovascular procedures.

Indexed as

Endovascular ProceduresMechanical PhenomenaAnimalsCathetersEquipment DesignSwine

Identifiers

PMID40094461
PMCPMC12502042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.