ArticleJournal of patient safety2025
A Mixed Methods SEIPS-based Evaluation of a Patient-centered ED Discharge Process Redesign for Older Adults.
Article in Journal of patient safety, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Enhancing emergency department experiences for older adults: a rapid review (2020-2025).International journal of emergency medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe transition of older adults from the emergency department (ED) to home remains a potential area of preventable harm. Through a human-centered design process, we developed a patient-centered intervention aimed at improving communication and coordination between ED staff and patients. The intervention included a new electronic health record (EHR)-based template for physicians to enter discharge instructions, a redesigned after-visit-summary (AVS), enhanced nurse training for patient teach-back, and EHR-embedded tips for nurses at the time of follow-up call. Our research objective was to evaluate this patient-centered ED discharge process redesign from multiple perspectives.
methodsUsing the SEIPS 3.0 model, we evaluated the intervention, in particular work system barriers and facilitators in the 3 subprocesses of the redesigned ED discharge process: physician writing discharge instructions, nurse/patient communication at discharge, and nurse/patient communication at follow-up call. We used multiple methods to collect quantitative and qualitative data from the perspectives of patients, and ED physicians and nurses.
resultsOverall, the redesigned patient-centered discharge process was perceived positively by ED physicians and advanced practice providers, ED nurses, and patients. All 3 groups identified work system facilitators regarding the intervention, in particular the usability of the AVS. Work system barriers pointed to areas for future improvement of the intervention, such as adding prepopulated information to the AVS.
conclusionsUsing a human-centered design process, we improved ED discharge for older adults. Our SEIPS-based research and evaluation fit with the learning health system concept as it provides input for future work system and patient safety improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.