Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40094456›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient safety2025

A Mixed Methods SEIPS-based Evaluation of a Patient-centered ED Discharge Process Redesign for Older Adults.

Pascale Carayon, Kathryn Wust, Hanna J Barton, Manish N Shah, Paula Vw Dail, Barbara J King, Denise M Buckley, Brad Ehlenfeldt, Brian W Patterson, Peter Hoonakker and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient safety, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Pascale CarayonDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.ORCID 0000-0003-4632-6930
Kathryn WustDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Hanna J BartonBerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Manish N ShahBerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Paula Vw DailUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison Patient and Family Advisory Council.
Barbara J KingSchool of Nursing, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Denise M BuckleyUW Health.
Brad EhlenfeldtUW Health.
Brian W PattersonBerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Peter HoonakkerWisconsin Institute for Healthcare Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
Nicole E WernerIndiana University School of Public Health-Bloomington, Bloomington, Indiana.

Funding

University of Wisconsin Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR002373 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI ELIZABETH S BURNSIDE, Allan R. Brasier · 2017 to 2026
$75.9M
AHRQ HHS R18 HS026624NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002373
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe transition of older adults from the emergency department (ED) to home remains a potential area of preventable harm. Through a human-centered design process, we developed a patient-centered intervention aimed at improving communication and coordination between ED staff and patients. The intervention included a new electronic health record (EHR)-based template for physicians to enter discharge instructions, a redesigned after-visit-summary (AVS), enhanced nurse training for patient teach-back, and EHR-embedded tips for nurses at the time of follow-up call. Our research objective was to evaluate this patient-centered ED discharge process redesign from multiple perspectives.

methodsUsing the SEIPS 3.0 model, we evaluated the intervention, in particular work system barriers and facilitators in the 3 subprocesses of the redesigned ED discharge process: physician writing discharge instructions, nurse/patient communication at discharge, and nurse/patient communication at follow-up call. We used multiple methods to collect quantitative and qualitative data from the perspectives of patients, and ED physicians and nurses.

resultsOverall, the redesigned patient-centered discharge process was perceived positively by ED physicians and advanced practice providers, ED nurses, and patients. All 3 groups identified work system facilitators regarding the intervention, in particular the usability of the AVS. Work system barriers pointed to areas for future improvement of the intervention, such as adding prepopulated information to the AVS.

conclusionsUsing a human-centered design process, we improved ED discharge for older adults. Our SEIPS-based research and evaluation fit with the learning health system concept as it provides input for future work system and patient safety improvement.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalPatient-Centered CarePatient DischargeAgedCommunicationElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansMaledischargeemergency departmenthuman-centered designolder adultpatient centeredSEIPS

Identifiers

PMID40094456
PMCPMC13033246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.