ArticleHuman molecular genetics2025
A de novo deletion underlying spinal muscular atrophy: implications for carrier testing and genetic counseling.
Article in Human molecular genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Retrospective analysis of spinal muscular atrophy in tunisian population: phenotypic-genotypic associations and considerations for therapeutic advancement.Neurogenetics · 2026Article
- Expanding 5q-SMA Newborn Screening in Latin America: A Brazilian Model for National and Regional Implementation.International journal of neonatal screening · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is an autosomal recessive disease most commonly caused by homozygous deletion of the SMN1 gene. Parents of affected children are typically carriers, with a recurrence risk of 25% for future pregnancies. Their close relatives have up to 50% chance of being carriers. Carriers typically possess a single copy of the SMN1 gene; however, some parents carry two copies of SMN1. Current standard diagnostic carrier tests are unable to distinguish between silent carriers with two copies on one chromosome (2 + 0 genotype) and non-carriers (1 + 1 genotype), where a de novo deletion occurred. This distinction is crucial for recurrence risk assessment, which highlights the unsolved challenge to carrier testing and genetic counseling. We combined microsatellite marker analysis, SMN copy number analysis, Sanger sequencing, long-read sequencing and de novo assembly to investigate the cause of the absence of SMN1 in a pedigree with an SMA patient identified through newborn screening, whose parents each carried two SMN1 copies. Our analysis revealed that the father is a silent carrier, while de novo assembly of the SMN locus showed a 1.4 megabase (Mb) de novo deletion between mother and child. This deletion encompasses SMN1 and SMN2 and represents the first reported nucleotide-level resolved SMA-causing deletion to date. Our findings allowed informed counseling of at-risk relatives and illustrate the complexity of SMA carrier testing and counseling. This case underscores the feasibility of and need for advanced genetic testing for SMA carriership in select cases, to improve genetic counseling practices, risk assessment, and family planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.