Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40094318›Full record

ArticleDiagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey)2025

Automatic bone age assessment: a Turkish population study.

Samet Öztürk, Murat Yüce, Gül Gizem Pamuk, Candan Varlık, Ahmet Tan Cimilli, Musa Atay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Samet ÖztürkEsenler Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics Hospital, Clinic of Radiology, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-7142-1545
Murat YüceIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0619-5868
Gül Gizem PamukUniversity of Health Sciences Türkiye, Bağcılar Training and Research Hospital, Clinic of Radiology, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-8326-7506
Candan VarlıkUniversity of Health Sciences Türkiye, Bağcılar Training and Research Hospital, Clinic of Radiology, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0003-3331-6493
Ahmet Tan CimilliUniversity of Health Sciences Türkiye, Bağcılar Training and Research Hospital, Clinic of Radiology, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-7500-7707
Musa AtayUniversity of Health Sciences Türkiye, Bağcılar Training and Research Hospital, Clinic of Radiology, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-7750-3093

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEstablished methods for bone age assessment (BAA), such as the Greulich and Pyle atlas, suffer from variability due to population differences and observer discrepancies. Although automated BAA offers speed and consistency, limited research exists on its performance across different populations using deep learning. This study examines deep learning algorithms on the Turkish population to enhance bone age models by understanding demographic influences.

methodsWe analyzed reports from Bağcılar Hospital's Health Information Management System between April 2012 and September 2023 using "bone age" as a keyword. Patient images were re-evaluated by an experienced radiologist and anonymized. A total of 2,730 hand radiographs from Bağcılar Hospital (Turkish population), 12,572 from the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA), and 6,185 from the Radiological Hand Pose Estimation (RHPE) public datasets were collected, along with corresponding bone ages and gender information. A random set of 546 radiographs (273 from Bağcılar, 273 from public datasets) was initially randomly split for an internal test set with bone age stratification; the remaining data were used for training and validation. BAAs were generated using a modified InceptionV3 model on 500 × 500-pixel images, selecting the model with the lowest mean absolute error (MAE) on the validation set.

resultsThree models were trained and tested based on dataset origin: Bağcılar (Turkish), public (RSNA-RHPE), and a Combined model. Internal test set predictions of the Combined model estimated bone age within less than 6, 12, 18, and 24 months at rates of 44%, 73%, 87%, and 94%, respectively. The MAE was 9.2 months in the overall internal test set, 7 months on the public test set, and 11.5 months on the Bağcılar internal test data. The Bağcılar-only model had an MAE of 12.7 months on the Bağcılar internal test data. Despite less training data, there was no significant difference between the combined and Bağcılar models on the Bağcılar dataset (

conclusionWe developed an automatic BAA model including the Turkish population, one of the few such studies using deep learning. Despite challenges from population differences and data heterogeneity, these models can be effectively used in various clinical settings. Model accuracy can improve over time with cumulative data, and publicly available datasets may further refine them. Our approach enables more accurate and efficient BAAs, supporting healthcare professionals where traditional methods are time-consuming and variable. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The developed automated BAA model for the Turkish population offers a reliable and efficient alternative to traditional methods. By utilizing deep learning with diverse datasets from Bağcılar Hospital and publicly available sources, the model minimizes assessment time and reduces variability. This advancement enhances clinical decision-making, supports standardized BAA practices, and improves patient care in various healthcare settings.

Indexed as

Age Determination by SkeletonDeep LearningRadiographyAdolescentAdultAgedAlgorithmsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHand BonesHumansInfantMaleMiddle AgedTurkeyartificial intelligenceBone age assessmentconvolutional neural networkdeep learningInceptionV3

Identifiers

PMID40094318
PMCPMC12417913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.