Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40094211›Full record

GuidelineJournal of the American Heart Association2025

Blood Culture-Negative Endocarditis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association:

Daniel C DeSimone, Zerelda Esquer Garrigos, Grace E Marx, Pierre Tattevin, Barbara Hasse, David W McCormick, Margaret M Hannan, Liesl J Zuhlke, Connie S Radke, Larry M Baddour and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readReviewPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A rare presentation of nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. CJC open · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Case reports in cardiology · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Daniel C DeSimone
Zerelda Esquer Garrigos
Grace E Marx
Pierre Tattevin
Barbara Hasse
David W McCormick
Margaret M Hannan
Liesl J Zuhlke
Connie S Radke
Larry M Baddour
American Heart Association Council on Lifelong Congenital Heart Disease and Heart Health in the Young; Council on Clinical Cardiology; and Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blood culture-negative endocarditis has been associated with worse outcomes when compared with blood culture-positive endocarditis, because pathogen-directed antimicrobial therapy and other management aspects have been difficult to achieve. Novel diagnostic tools, however, have changed the landscape of this syndrome and will likely improve patient outcomes. This American Heart Association scientific statement highlights these advances. The writing group, which represents a multidisciplinary team, provides an update on blood culture-negative endocarditis. Clinical scenarios representative of real-world experiences are included to assist frontline clinicians in the diagnosis and management of this syndrome.

Indexed as

Blood CultureEndocarditisEndocarditis, BacterialAmerican Heart AssociationAnti-Bacterial AgentsHumansUnited StatesAnti-Bacterial AgentsAHA Scientific Statementsblood culture–negative infective endocarditisdiagnosismanagementprevention

Identifiers

PMID40094211
PMCPMC12132861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.