ArticleDigestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society2025
Peroral endoscopic myotomy in spastic esophageal disorders: Clinical outcomes and optimal approaches.
Article in Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Enhanced Visualization of the Distal Myotomy Endpoint during Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy Using Indocyanine Green With Infrared Imaging.DEN open · 2026Article
- An Exploratory Endoscopic Achalasia Phenotype With Visible Squamocolumnar Junction and Distal Esophagogastric Junction Relaxation Failure: Association With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease After Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (With Video).Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2026Article
- Evolving Indications of Esophageal Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (E-POEM): A Review of Expanding Applications in Esophageal Pathologies.Current gastroenterology reports · 2025Review
- Spastic Esophageal Disorders-How Much Muscle Should We Cut?Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe efficacy and safety of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for spastic esophageal disorders (SED), including type III achalasia, distal esophageal spasm (DES), and jackhammer esophagus (JE), remain uncertain due to its rarity. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes and optimal strategies for managing SED.
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent POEM for SED between March 2014 and December 2023. Myotomy was tailored to target spastic segments in all cases. For type III achalasia, the myotomy extended into the gastric cardia, while for DES and JE, the procedure either preserved the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) or included a gastric myotomy. Outcomes assessed included procedural details, technical and clinical success, adverse events, and the incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) post-POEM. Clinical success was defined as an Eckardt score of ≤3.
resultsAmong 2938 POEM procedures, 106 (3.6%) were for SED. The cohort included 58 patients (54.8%) with type III achalasia, 24 (22.6%) with DES, and 24 (22.6%) with JE. The technical success rate was 100%, with clinical success rates of 98.1% at 2-3 months and 92.6% at 1 year. Erosive esophagitis occurred in 27.7% at 2-3 months and 16.1% at 1 year. LES-preserving POEM for DES and JE showed comparable efficacy to POEM with gastric myotomy, with a trend toward reduced GERD incidence.
conclusionPeroral endoscopic myotomy is an effective treatment for all types of SED. LES-preserving POEM is a viable strategy for treating DES and JE, offering comparable efficacy, while potentially minimizing GERD risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.