Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40094150›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastrointestinal pharmacology and therapeutics2025

Rebamipide in gastric mucosal protection and healing: An Asian perspective.

Manish Kak

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastrointestinal pharmacology and therapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Comparative Efficacy and Safety of StillenJournal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Manish KakDepartment of Gastroenterology, Manipal Hospital, Ghaziabad 201002, Uttar Pradesh, India. manishkak@yahoo.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review emphasizes the exemplary safety and efficacy of rebamipide in the treatment of gastric ulcers and other mucosa-related disorders, positioning it as a viable candidate for inclusion in treatment guidelines across India and globally. An in-depth literature review of rebamipide was carried out on PubMed and Google Scholar. Rebamipide has a multifaceted mechanism of action, including prostaglandin synthesis, scavenging free radicals, and enhancing mucin production, leading to enhanced mucosal protection and ulcer healing. Rebamipide serves as a highly effective and safe treatment option for gastric ulcers and gastroesophageal reflux disease. The efficacy of this drug in treating ulcers often surpasses that of routinely used agents such as pantoprazole, sucralfate, misoprostol, famotidine, lansoprazole, and esomeprazole. This superiority of rebamipide can be attributed to the low rate of adverse events associated with it and its mild side effects, contributing to its widespread adoption across Southeast Asia and Russia. This popularity extends to its application beyond gastrointestinal ailments. Notably, it has been successfully employed in the treatment of ophthalmological, oncological, and bone regeneration-related issues. Rebamipide's exemplary safety and efficacy in treating gastric ulcers and other mucosa-related disorders support its potential for inclusion in treatment guidelines, not only in India but also globally.

Indexed as

Gastroesophageal reflux diseaseMucosal protectionPeptic ulcerRebamipideTreatment

Identifiers

PMID40094150
PMCPMC11907339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.