Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40094085›Full record

ArticleClinical interventions in aging2025

Is Removal of Implants Mandatory Following Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Screw-Rod Stabilization Without Fusion for Mono-Segmental Thoracolumbar Fractures in Elderly Patients?

Chao Zhang, Cheng Xu, Dike Ruan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical interventions in aging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Implantation choices, fusion preferences and implant removal after fixation in C1-C2 fractures: An AO Spine Knowledge Forum expert survey.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chao Zhang *Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Sixth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-2177-4713
Cheng Xu *Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Sixth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Dike RuanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Sixth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Despite the lack of evidence, the current standard of care following posterior pedicle screw-rod stabilization for spinal trauma includes instrumentation removal. This retrospective cohort study aimed to assess the necessity of implant removal in patients aged ≥65 years who underwent minimally invasive pedicle screw-rod fixation for AO type A and B thoracolumbar fractures. Methods: We evaluated the clinical and radiological outcomes of 57 patients aged ≥65 years with mono-segmental AO type A and B thoracolumbar fractures treated with percutaneous short-segment pedicle screw fixation, and compared the two groups with and without hardware removal. Clinical outcomes included the visual analog scale score for back pain (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), residual chronic back pain (RCBP) and implant-related complications. Radiological parameters, such as the vertebral wedge angle (VWA), segmental kyphosis Cobb angle (SKCA), anterior edge height ratio (AEHR) and adjacent intervertebral height index (IHI), were measured. Results: No significant differences were observed between the two groups in the mean VAS and ODI values at 12 months and final follow-up. The incidence of RCBP in the implant retention group (25.9%) was slightly higher than that in the implant removal group (20%). However, there were no significant differences between the two groups. Both groups showed correction loss over time. An increase in the segmental kyphosis Cobb angle only differed by 2.02° with no significant difference between the two groups at final follow-up (implant removal group A 4.15°, implant removal group 2.13°). However, whether the implant was removed or not, no statistically significant differences were found in the correction loss of SKCA, VWA, IHI, or AEHR between the two groups within the 12-month follow-up period. Conclusion: Our results suggest that percutaneous short-segment pedicle screw fixation showed similar radiological and functional outcomes in patients aged ≥65 years, regardless of whether the implants were removed after fracture healing.

Indexed as

Device RemovalFracture Fixation, InternalLumbar VertebraeMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresPedicle ScrewsSpinal FracturesThoracic VertebraeAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMalePostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcomeimplant removalinstrumentationminimally invasive surgerypedicle screwsspinal fractures

Identifiers

PMID40094085
PMCPMC11910041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.