Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40094075›Full record

ArticleJB & JS open access

Intraoperative Neuromonitoring During Periacetabular Osteotomy Provides Actionable Alerts.

Lukas G Keil, James D Bomar, Carolyn R Bower, Melanie H Venne, Patrick F Curran, Vidyadhar V Upasani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JB & JS open access. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lukas G KeilDepartment of Orthopedics, Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego, California.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0713-0097
James D BomarDepartment of Orthopedics, Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego, California.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3066-0109
Carolyn R BowerNeurodynamics, Inc., San Diego, California.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-8552-9064
Melanie H VenneNeurodynamics, Inc., San Diego, California.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0053-9336
Patrick F CurranDepartment of Orthopedics, Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego, California.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9333-0740
Vidyadhar V UpasaniDepartment of Orthopedics, Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego, California.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2635-9823

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Bernese periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) for symptomatic acetabular dysplasia and femoroacetabular impingement has become increasingly common, with a corresponding increase in the incidence of adverse outcomes. The rate of major neurological injury (excluding lateral femoral cutaneous nerve injury) during PAO has been reported to be around 2%. Previous publications have recommended the use of intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) to mitigate risk of major neurological injury during PAO, but its use has not become universal among PAO surgeons as it has among spine surgeons. The purpose of this study was to report the incidence and clinical significance of IONM alerts in a single-surgeon, consecutive cohort of patients treated with Bernese PAO. Methods: After a permanent peripheral nerve injury during a PAO without IONM, IONM has been used at our institution in every PAO. Motor evoked potentials and somatosensory monitoring are performed throughout the procedure. We conducted a retrospective review of all PAOs performed after this practice change between 2017 and 2023. Medical records were reviewed for all IONM alerts, surgical team responses to alerts, and postoperative neurological status. Results: All 94 PAOs performed with IONM in 82 patients during the study period were included. The mean age was 19 years (range 11-38). Significant IONM alerts occurred in 10 of 94 PAOs (11%) in 10 patients. Of these 10 alerts, 6 resulted in action taken by the surgical team including adjustment of acetabular fragment correction, leg repositioning, or stockinette or boot loosening. The remaining 4 alerts were due to anesthetic or systemic causes or technical issues with the neuromonitoring electrodes. No patients had a detectable neurological deficit postoperatively. Conclusions: IONM may produce alerts in approximately 1 in 9 periacetabular osteotomies. These alerts are actionable and may improve patient safety and minimize the non-negligible risk of major nerve injury. This study provides additional evidence to support the utility of IONM in PAO. Level of Evidence: Level III-retrospective cohort study. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Identifiers

PMID40094075
PMCPMC11896103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.