ReviewBBA advances2025
Quality assessment strategy development and analytical method selection of GMP grade biological drugs for gene and cell therapy.
Review in BBA advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fibroblast-Based Cell Therapy: Molecular Background, Current Therapies and Future Perspectives.Cells · 2026Review
- Physical stimuli-responsive CRISPR-Cas9 systems for spatiotemporally precise control of genome engineering.Theranostics · 2026Review
- Quality control strategy for differentiating induced pluripotent stem cells into pancreatic β-cells before transplantation.Regenerative medicine · 2026Review
- Safety Assessment of Stem Cell-Based Therapies: Current Standards and Advancing Frameworks.Cells · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biological drugs with gene and cell therapy potentials, including natural or rationally created biomacromolecules, recombinant proteins/enzymes, gene-carrying DNA/RNA fragments, oncolytic viruses, plasmid and viral vectors or other gene delivering vehicles with specific therapeutic genes and gene manipulation tools, and genetically modified and reprogrammed human cells comprise a large fraction of drug development candidates in modern precision and regeneration medicine. These drugs have displayed unique capabilities in treating patients with previously incurable diseases. However, most of the drug preparations have complex multimolecular structures and require specific biomanufacturing systems and many other additional biological active materials for drug synthesis, cell expansion, and production enhancement. Thus, the final products would have to be subjected to sequential extensive purification processes to exclude impurities and to concentrate the drug products after manufacturing. The quality evaluation for each drug product is an individualized process and must be specifically designed and performed according to the characteristics of the drug and its manufacturing and purification methods. Some of the Quality Control (QC) assays may be very costly and time-consuming, frequently with inconsistent test results from batch-to-batch. This review focuses on QC assessment strategy development for common gene and cell therapy drugs which use prokaryotic or eukaryotic cells for manufacturing or cell factories for
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.