Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40094038›Full record

ArticleAffective science2025

Perceptual Decision-Making Regarding Phylogenetically Salient Stimuli.

Sekine Ozturk, Tamara J Sussman, Jingwen Jin, Megan R Serody, Gabriella Imbriano, Aprajita Mohanty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Affective science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sekine OzturkDepartment of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6462-0669
Tamara J SussmanDepartment of Psychiatry, New York State Psychiatric Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY USA.
Jingwen JinDepartment of Psychology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR China.
Megan R SerodyDepartment of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY USA.
Gabriella ImbrianoWomen's Operational Military Exposure Network Center of Excellence (WOMEN COE), VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA USA.
Aprajita MohantyDepartment of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phylogenetically salient stimuli such as spiders are commonly reported threats in the general population and the most common object of specific phobias in clinical populations. Several theories have hypothesized that our perceptual systems prioritize such stimuli in an "automatic" or "bottom-up" manner due to their evolutionary salience. However, empirical research on the perceptual processing of these stimuli as well as the influence of "top-down" goal-driven and bottom-up stimulus-driven factors is lacking. Here, we used perceptual psychophysics to determine absolute perceptual thresholds for the detection of spider and crab images. Subsequently, participants used spider and crab cues (that imposed a top-down perceptual set) to detect spiders and crab images presented at their predetermined perceptual threshold in a two-alternative forced-choice perceptual decision-making task. While spiders were detected at lower perceptual thresholds than crabs, they were not immune to top-down influence. Indeed, compared to top-down crab cues, spider cues improved the speed and accuracy of detection of spiders vs crabs. Using a hierarchical drift diffusion model, we found that spider cues biased decision-making not only by shifting the starting point of evidence accumulation towards the spider decision, but also by increasing the efficiency with which sensory evidence accumulated, more so for spider than crab perceptual decisions. Overall, these findings provide evidence for the perceptual prioritization of phylogenetically salient stimuli and highlight the computational mechanisms by which this prioritization is facilitated by bottom-up and top-down factors. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s42761-024-00271-z.

Indexed as

Drift diffusion modelingPerceptual decision-makingPhylogeneticSpiderThreat

Identifiers

PMID40094038
PMCPMC11904085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.