ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Preoperative prediction of recurrence risk factors in operable cervical cancer based on clinical-radiomics features.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- PET/CT-based quantification of intratumoral heterogeneity for predicting pathological complete response in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A multicentre study.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Integrating Clinical and Transcriptomic Profiles Associated with Vitamin D to Enhance Disease-Free Survival in Cervical Cancer Recurrence Using the CatBoost Algorithm.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the value of preoperative prediction of risk factors for recurrence of operable cervical cancer based on the radiomics features of biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bp-MRI) combined with clinical features. Method: A retrospective collection of cervical cancer cases undergoing radical hysterectomy + pelvic and/or para-aortic lymph node dissection at the Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College was conducted. Region of interest (ROI) was outlined using the 3D Slicer software, and radiomics after feature extraction and feature screening was performed using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithm. Logistic regression algorithms were used to construct a fusion clinical-radiomics model to visualize nomograms. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC), DeLong test, calibration curve (CC), and decision curve (DC) were used to evaluate the predictive performance and clinical benefit of the model. Result: A total of 99 patients with cervical cancer were included in this study, with 79 and 20 cases in the training and test groups, respectively. Seventeen key features were selected for radiomics model construction. Three clinical features were screened to construct a clinical model. A fusion model of the radiomics model combined with the clinical model was constructed. The area under the curve (AUC) values in the training group were 0.710 (95% CI 0.602-0.819), 0.892 (95% CI 0.826-0.958), and 0.906 (95% CI 0.842-0.970), for the comparative clinical model, radiomics model, and fusion model, respectively, and the AUC values in the testing group were 0.620 (95% CI 0.366-0.874), 0.860 (95% CI 0.677-1.000), and 0.880 (95% CI 0.690-1.000), respectively. The DeLong test showed a statistically significant difference between the AUC values of the fusion model and the clinical model ( Conclusion: The fusion model constructed based on bp-MRI radiomics features combined with clinical features provides an important reference for predicting the risk status of recurrence in operable cervical cancer. The findings of this study are preliminary exploratory results, and further large-scale, multicenter studies are needed to validate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.