ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
The efficacy and safety of
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Beyond [BMC cancer · 2026Pooled it
- Clinical research analysis of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- PSMA-targeted radioligand therapy in advanced prostate cancer: a narrative review of ^177Lu-PSMA, emerging ^225Ac-PSMA strategies, and therapeutic sequencing.Oncology reviews · 2026Review
- Bridging the Gap: PSMA Radioligand Therapy for Asian Men with Prostate Cancer.Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: We aimed to report our clinical experience with the use of Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 29 metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients treated with Results: 29 patients with mCRPC underwent a total of 50 treatment cycles. The median age of the patients was 67 years (55-84years). Out of these patients, 11 had previously underwent Conclusions: In mCRPC, the results indicated that
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.