Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40093918›Full record

ArticleClinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science2025

Testing a Reward-Processing Model of Negative Urgency in Women With and Without Binge Eating.

Sarah E Racine, Vittoria Trolio, Alexia E Miller, Adrienne Mehak, Ege Bicaker, Samantha Wilson, Stephen D Benning

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sarah E RacineDepartment of Psychology, McGill University.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2700-4031
Vittoria TrolioDepartment of Psychology, McGill University.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7484-5554
Alexia E MillerDepartment of Psychology, McGill University.
Adrienne MehakDepartment of Psychology, McGill University.
Ege BicakerDepartment of Psychology, McGill University.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6530-4812
Samantha WilsonDepartment of Psychology, McGill University.
Stephen D BenningDepartment of Psychology, University of Nevada Las Vegas.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Negative urgency (i.e., the tendency to act impulsively when experiencing negative affect) is robustly associated with psychopathology, but the mechanisms underlying negative urgency and its relation to mental health are not well understood. In addition to interfering with cognitive control, negative emotions may lead to impulsive behavior by enhancing reward processing of desired stimuli. In this study, we tested an emotion-enhanced reward-processing model of negative urgency in 153 women who spanned the spectrum of binge-eating severity. Participants completed two experimental tasks under both stressful- and relaxed-mood conditions while physiological, behavioral, and self-report indices of reward processing of palatable food were assessed. Contrary to hypotheses, reward processing of food was not heightened when stressed versus relaxed either in the full sample or in participants with greater negative urgency or binge-eating frequency/severity. Findings are discussed considering study limitations and previous mechanistic work on negative urgency.

Indexed as

binge eatingeating disordersmood inductionnegative urgencypalatable foodreward processing

Identifiers

PMID40093918
PMCPMC11906250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.