Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40093827›Full record

ReviewACS materials Au2025

Polymer Encapsulated Framework Materials for Enhanced Gas Storage and Separations.

Grace E B Redwine, Wade A Braunecker, Thomas Gennett

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS materials Au, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Grace E B RedwineDepartment of Chemistry, Colorado School of Mines, 1012 14th Street, Golden, Colorado 80401, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9698-9639
Wade A BrauneckerDepartment of Chemistry, Colorado School of Mines, 1012 14th Street, Golden, Colorado 80401, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0773-9580
Thomas GennettDepartment of Chemistry, Colorado School of Mines, 1012 14th Street, Golden, Colorado 80401, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1259-6588

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Within the broader field of energy storage, polymer-encapsulated framework (PEF) materials have witnessed remarkable growth in recent years, with transformative implications for diverse applications. This comprehensive review discusses in detail the latest advancements in the design, synthesis, and applications of PEFs in gas storage and separations. Following a thorough survey of existing literature, the article delves into mechanistic considerations and foundational principles governing PEF synthesis. Emphasis is placed on covalent and coordinative covalent grafting methods, physical blending, nonsolvent utilization, and various vapor deposition techniques. The discussion critically evaluates the advantages and disadvantages of these synthesis approaches, considering factors such as grafting density, coating thickness, and other physical properties relevant to processability and stability in comparison to traditional framework materials. Special attention is given to the impact of polymer coatings on gas adsorption analysis. Finally, notable accomplishments and advancements in the PEF field, including mixed matrix membrane (MMM) technology, improvements in framework form factors, and enhanced chemical and mechanical stability are summarized. This review concludes by offering valuable perspective for researchers, highlighting gaps and challenges that confront the current state-of-the-art in PEF materials, paving the way for future innovations that are poised to help address global energy challenges.

Identifiers

PMID40093827
PMCPMC11907295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.