ArticleInternational journal of medical sciences2025
Data Mining of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System and Animal Experiments for Assessment of Rhabdomyolysis Risk Associated with Lipid-lowering Drugs.
Article in International journal of medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unraveling the Mechanisms of Wuling Powder Against MASLD by Integrated Metabolomics-Gut Microbiota-Serum Pharmacochemistry.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Data Mining of the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report Database and Animal Experiments for Assessment of Risks Associated With Pemafibrate.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite extensive research on pharmacokinetic interactions between hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) and fibrates, the underlying pharmacodynamic mechanisms contributing to the increased risk of rhabdomyolysis remain unclear. This study aimed to determine the differences among statins or fibrates in terms of their susceptibility to rhabdomyolysis. The data mining of FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) suggested the association of both statins and fibrates with rhabdomyolysis and the add-on effect of their combinations. In rats, their administration was associated with outliers in creatine phosphokinase and myoglobin levels and a larger distribution of data than in the control. Additionally, co-administration of cerivastatin increased the gemfibrozil concentration in skin and muscle tissues by more than two-fold without an increase in systemic exposure to gemfibrozil, suggesting that an alteration in the pharmacokinetics of gemfibrozil might contribute to an increased risk of rhabdomyolysis when cerivastatin and gemfibrozil are co-administered. Taken together, caution is uniformly needed in combination therapy with statins and fibrates because of the increased risk of rhabdomyolysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.