Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40093768›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in fungal biology2025

Can whole genome sequencing resolve taxonomic ambiguities in fungi? The case study of

Andrea Menicucci, Salvatore Iacono, Madalena Ramos, Chiara Fiorenzani, Natalia Aparecida Peres, Lavern Wayne Timmer, Antonio Prodi, Riccardo Baroncelli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in fungal biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Draft genome sequence data ofData in brief · 2026
    Article
  4. Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  5. Draft genome sequence data ofData in brief · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. T2TJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Genome-resolved tracking ofFrontiers in fungal biology · 2025
    Article
  10. Addition of two new genera-Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Andrea MenicucciDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences (DISTAL), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Salvatore IaconoDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences (DISTAL), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Madalena RamosDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences (DISTAL), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Chiara FiorenzaniDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences (DISTAL), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Natalia Aparecida PeresPlant Pathology Department, Gulf Coast Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Wimauma, FL, United States.
Lavern Wayne TimmerPlant Pathology Department, Citrus Research and Education Center, Lake Alfred, FL, United States.
Antonio ProdiDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences (DISTAL), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Riccardo BaroncelliDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences (DISTAL), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The genus Methods: A total of 18 Results: Genome-wide phylogenomic analysis revealed distinct evolutionary lineages among Discussion: These findings demonstrate the superiority of WGS over MLST in resolving species boundaries and reconstructing evolutionary relationships. The enhanced resolution provided by genome-wide data enables more accurate taxonomic classification, reducing misidentifications and improving our understanding of fungal biodiversity. By refining

Indexed as

fungal genomesMLSTorthologous genesphylogenomicsWGS

Identifiers

PMID40093768
PMCPMC11906685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.