Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40093764›Full record

ReviewJournal of neuroendovascular therapy2025

Robotics for Neuroendovascular Therapy.

Shigeru Miyachi, Yoshitaka Nagano, Reo Kawaguchi, Hiroki Tadauchi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neuroendovascular therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shigeru MiyachiDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Aichi Medical University, Nagakute, Aichi, Japan.
Yoshitaka NaganoFaculty of Engineering, Aichi University of Technology, Gamagori, Aichi, Japan.
Reo KawaguchiDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Aichi Medical University, Nagakute, Aichi, Japan.
Hiroki TadauchiFaculty of Engineering, Aichi University of Technology, Gamagori, Aichi, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the field of abdominal and pelvic surgery, endoscopic procedures have increasingly utilized robotic surgery, including the da Vinci system (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Unlike robotic surgery in these fields, endovascular treatment involves simple movements such as pushing and pulling or twisting catheters and wires, allowing for the creation of relatively straightforward robotic systems that can replicate these endovascular procedures. Recently, there have been clinical applications of this technology in coronary arteries. However, when applying it to cerebral vessels, which have significant curvature and fragility, it is essential to develop a system that can adequately assess and reflect the physical stress on the vessel wall. Furthermore, remote surgery (telesurgery) performed by specialists is one of the most sought-after applications of robotics, but issues remain due to poor communication environments, leading to delays in operation and control difficulties. Additionally, there are ethical concerns regarding the responsibility for adverse events related to robotic surgery, highlighting the urgent need for the establishment of guidelines.

Indexed as

neuroendovascular therapyremote controlrobotics

Identifiers

PMID40093764
PMCPMC11911030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.