ReviewJournal of neuroendovascular therapy2025
Robotics for Neuroendovascular Therapy.
Review in Journal of neuroendovascular therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improving catheter navigation in neurointerventional procedures: single-center insights on next-generation steerable guidewires.Neuroradiology · 2026Article
- Advancements and challenges in autonomous endovascular interventional robotics: A comprehensive review.iScience · 2025Review
- Robotics in Cerebrovascular Disease: The Final Frontier.Missouri medicineReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the field of abdominal and pelvic surgery, endoscopic procedures have increasingly utilized robotic surgery, including the da Vinci system (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Unlike robotic surgery in these fields, endovascular treatment involves simple movements such as pushing and pulling or twisting catheters and wires, allowing for the creation of relatively straightforward robotic systems that can replicate these endovascular procedures. Recently, there have been clinical applications of this technology in coronary arteries. However, when applying it to cerebral vessels, which have significant curvature and fragility, it is essential to develop a system that can adequately assess and reflect the physical stress on the vessel wall. Furthermore, remote surgery (telesurgery) performed by specialists is one of the most sought-after applications of robotics, but issues remain due to poor communication environments, leading to delays in operation and control difficulties. Additionally, there are ethical concerns regarding the responsibility for adverse events related to robotic surgery, highlighting the urgent need for the establishment of guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.