ArticleNorth American Spine Society journal2024
Facet joint loading after 1-, 2- and 3-level cervical disc arthroplasty: a comparison of spiked versus keeled baseplates.
Article in North American Spine Society journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The purpose of this study was to examine facet contact forces above, below, and at surgical index levels induced by artificial disc implantation and compare the results from spiked versus keeled baseplates comprising the arthroplasty device. Methods: Human specimens from C2 to C7 were subjected to flexion, extension, and lateral bending prior to, and following random allocation to spiked or keeled cervical arthroplasty at the index (C5-C6), inferior (C6-C7), and superior (C4-C5) levels. Thin film force sensors were inserted unilaterally into the corresponding facets prior to intact testing. Force data was normalized to the minimum forces recorded during each loading mode under each condition, reported as (Max/Min) force ratio and subjected to a 1-way ANOVA with Dunnett's post-hoc tests for comparison to intact specimens. Results: Under flexion, compared to intact, all levels displayed a significant reduction in force ratio following a 1- and 3-level implantation for the spiked baseplate device. An increase in force ratio was observed at the index level for a 2-level implantation but was mitigated with the completion of a superior device insertion. No statistical differences were noted for keeled devices. In extension, the spiked baseplate device reduced the force ratio for 1- and 2-level implantations. A 3-level insertion did not alter facet force ratios. For the keeled device, no statistical changes were noted. Lateral bending associated with spiked devices resulted in statistically reduced or nonsignificant changes in facet loading ratios. The keeled devices did not display significant changes to facet force ratios. Conclusions: Implantation of multilevel disc devices can reduce or sustain unaltered facet loading conditions. In general, 3-level arthroplasty statistically reduced or does not increase facet force ratios compared to intact values. The use of spiked versus keel device baseplates is a clinical selection involving anterior/posterior placement and endplate degeneration conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.