ArticleDigital health
The global research of artificial intelligence on inflammatory bowel disease: A bibliometric analysis.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Knowledge structure and paradigm evolution in anal fistula diagnosis and treatment: a bibliometric analysis based on PubMed.Updates in surgery · 2026Article
- Assessing ChatGPT-v4 for Guideline-Concordant Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Accuracy, Completeness, and Temporal Drift.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in primary health care: A bibliometric analysis of publications from 2015 to 2024.Digital healthReview
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the related research on artificial intelligence (AI) in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) through bibliometrics analysis and identified the research basis, current hotspots, and future development. Methods: The related literature was acquired from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) on 31 December 2024. Co-occurrence and cooperation relationship analysis of (cited) authors, institutions, countries, cited journals, references, and keywords in the literature were carried out through CiteSpace 6.1.R6 software and the Online Analysis platform of Literature Metrology. Meanwhile, relevant knowledge maps were drawn, and keywords clustering analysis was performed. Results: According to WoSCC, 1919 authors, 790 research institutions, 184 journals, and 49 countries/regions published 176 AI-related papers in IBD during 1999-2024. The number of papers published has increased significantly since 2019, reaching a maximum by 2023. The United States had the highest number of publications and the closest collaboration with other countries. The clustering analysis showed that the earliest studies focused on "psychometric value" and then moved to "deep learning model," "intestinal ultrasound," and "new diagnostic strategies." Conclusion: This study is the first bibliometric analysis to summarize the current status and to visually reveal the development trends and future research hotspots of the application of AI in IBD. The application of AI in IBD is still in its infancy, and the focus of this field will shift to improving the efficiency of diagnosis and treatment through deep learning techniques, big data-based treatment, and prognosis prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.