ArticleDigital health
Intrinsic motivations in health and fitness app engagement: A mediation model of entertainment.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factors Influencing Adherence to Digital Lifestyle Interventions for Adolescents: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Attrition.Interactive journal of medical research · 2026Review
- Why Do Consumers Who Prefer Physical Entertainment Behave Digitally? Understanding the Preference-Behavior Gap.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Autonomous motivation moderates the relationship between fitness application usage and exercise behavior through flow experience: a cross-sectional study among Chinese university students.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
- The impact of fitness social media use on exercise behavior: the chained mediating role of intrinsic motivation and exercise intention.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Article
- Leveraging mobile fitness apps for healthier lifestyles: How affordances drive sustained engagement.Digital healthArticle
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to investigate the intrinsic motivations driving continued usage of health and fitness apps, addressing a gap in the literature where user motivation has received limited attention. The study focuses on the role of entertainment as a mediator between intrinsic motivations and continuance intention, using the Uses and Gratifications Theory as a conceptual framework. Methods: Data were collected through an online survey of 2869 health and fitness app users in Vietnam. Intrinsic motivations were categorized into challenge, curiosity, fantasy, and social interaction. Hypotheses were tested using SEM, and subgroup analyses were conducted to examine variations across demographic groups. Results: The findings reveal that entertainment mediates the relationship between intrinsic motivations and continuance intention, with challenge and curiosity being the strongest predictors of sustained app usage. Challenge also demonstrated a direct effect on continuance intention, independent of entertainment. Demographic analysis indicated that males are primarily motivated by challenge and curiosity, while females and higher-income users are driven more by curiosity. Conclusion: This study highlights the importance of intrinsic motivations in shaping user engagement with health and fitness apps. Practical implications include the need for app developers to design features that align with user motivations, such as gamified challenges, personalized content, and interactive elements. Future research should explore extrinsic motivations and validate the framework across other digital platforms to expand its applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.