ArticleDigital health
Machine learning for clustering and classification of early knee osteoarthritis using single-leg standing kinematics.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interpretable Machine Learning Model for Fungal Infection Prediction: A Real-World Study.Health care science · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in the biomechanics of knee osteoarthritis: biomechanical phenotyping, risk stratification, diagnosis, treatment and clinical translation-a narrative review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Detection of early osteoarthritis (EOA) of the knee is crucial for effective management and improved outcomes. This study investigated the application of machine learning techniques to single-leg standing (SLS) kinematics to classify and predict EOA. (1) To identify distinct groups based on SLS kinematic patterns using unsupervised learning algorithms, (2) to develop supervised learning models to predict EOA status, and (3) to identify the most influential kinematic variables associated with EOA. Methods: Total 43 manufacturing workers (86 legs) aged 40-70 years were evaluated. The participants were categorized using an Early Osteoarthritis Questionnaire. Single-leg standing kinematics was captured using 2D video analysis to assess the horizontal displacement of six key anatomical points (trunk, pelvis, femur, knee, lower leg, and ankle) in the frontal plane. K-means clustering was used for unsupervised learning, whereas six supervised machine learning algorithms were trained and validated for EOA classification. Results: In our machine learning models, we used 258 data points derived from three repeated measurements per participant. K-means clustering revealed three distinct groups based on SLS kinematics and demographic characteristics. The random forest algorithm achieved the highest classification accuracy (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 1.000, accuracy = 1.000) in distinguishing between individuals with and without EOA. Pelvic and ankle horizontal displacements were identified as the most influential predictors of EOA classification. Conclusions: Machine learning analysis of SLS kinematics shows significant potential for the early detection of knee osteoarthritis. Identification of key kinematic predictors, particularly pelvic and ankle movements, provides new insights into targeted interventions and screening protocols for rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.