ArticleOsteoarthritis and cartilage open2025
Optimizing osteoarthritis care through clinical and community partnership: Results of an exploratory trial.
Article in Osteoarthritis and cartilage open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background/Purpose: To conduct an exploratory trial of a clinic-community care model (OA CARE) for managing osteoarthritis (OA). Design: Participants (n = 60) with symptomatic knee or hip OA and overweight/obesity were randomized to OA CARE or a usual care control group (UC). Participants in the OA CARE group received a 12-month medical membership to a local YMCA, which included a 12-week weight loss program and access to exercise programming, as well as referrals to rehabilitation, nutrition, sleep-related and psychological services. Participants' primary care clinicians were given a video-based summary of OA treatment guidelines. Feasibility metrics included engagement with the weight loss program and exercise resources. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, 6-months and 12-months. The primary outcome was the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). Outcomes were analyzed between groups across time points using general linear mixed models. Results: Eighty-seven percent of the OA CARE group participated in the weight loss program, with a mean attendance of 9.2 sessions; 57 % participated in an exercise class. At 6-months, there was a statistically significant between-group difference in change in WOMAC total scores, with the OA CARE group showing greater improvement (-11.0, 95 % Confidence Interval -20.1, -1.9). At 12-months, the between-group change in WOMAC score was not statistically significant, though there was a small difference in favor of OA CARE Group (-4.9, 95 % Confidence Interval -14.1, 4.3). Conclusion: Feasibility metrics were positive, but effects of OA CARE were modest, and a more intensive approach may be needed to enhance impacts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.