Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40093650›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in health services2025

Restorative initiatives: emerging insights from design, implementation and collaboration in five countries.

Jo Wailling, Graham Cameron, Iwona Stolarek, Stephanie Turner, Beelah Bleakley, Nick O'Connor, Catriona Harwood, Michael Power, Kathryn Turner, Allison Kooijman and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in health services, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Jo WaillingThe National Collaborative for Restorative Initiatives in Health, Wellington, New Zealand.
Graham CameronThe National Collaborative for Restorative Initiatives in Health, Wellington, New Zealand.
Iwona StolarekThe National Collaborative for Restorative Initiatives in Health, Wellington, New Zealand.
Stephanie TurnerThe National Collaborative for Restorative Initiatives in Health, Wellington, New Zealand.
Beelah BleakleyACT Health Directorate, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Nick O'ConnorClinical Excellence Commission, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Catriona HarwoodMetro North Hospital and Health Service, Herston, QL, Australia.
Michael PowerQueensland Health Victim Support Service, Brisbane, QL, Australia.
Kathryn TurnerMetro North Hospital and Health Service, Herston, QL, Australia.
Allison KooijmanSchool of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Okanagan, Kelowna, BC, Canada.
Nelly D OelkeSchool of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Okanagan, Kelowna, BC, Canada.
David GustafsonCommunity Justice Initiatives Association, Langly, BC, Canada.
Rob RobsonHealthcare System Safety and Accountability, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Murray Anderson WallaceHealth Systems Innovation Unit, London South Bank University, London, United Kingdom.
Gerard DrennanPsychology & Psychotherapy, Behaviour & Developmental Psychiatry, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Jo HughesHarmed Patients Alliance, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Jane K O'HaraThe Healthcare Improvement Studies (THIS) Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Fin SwanepoelPsychology & Psychotherapy, Behaviour & Developmental Psychiatry, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Christopher H LeMasterKaiser Permanente, Oakland, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Restorative systems are human centred and distinguished by an emphasis on relational principles and practices. Emerging evidence indicates that a restorative approach holds promise to mitigate and respond to harm in the complex health environment. Advocates are collaborating with clinicians and institutions to develop restorative responses to adverse events. Method: This paper shares the insights of an international network who have been collaborating to nurture the development of restorative policy and practice in five countries since 2019 (Aotearoa New Zealand, Australia [New South Wales & Queensland]; Canada [British Columbia], England and the United States [California]). Our work is at varying stages of maturity and incorporates co-designing, implementing, and evaluating restorative responses to adverse events. Results & discussion: The viewpoint provides an overview of the core principles, emerging evidence, and shares our collective reflections about the constraining and enabling factors to development. We recognise that we cannot speak to the breadth of work underway worldwide. Our hope is that by drawing on our experiences, we can offer some thoughts about what a restorative lens offers the future of patient and family involvement in patient safety, whilst providing the opportunity for transparent critique of work to date.

Indexed as

adverse eventscompounded harmhealthcare harmpatient safetyrestorative approachesrestorative justicerestorative practicerestorative responses

Identifiers

PMID40093650
PMCPMC11906477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.