Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40093638›Full record

ReviewFood science of animal resources2025

The Quality Traits of Pork Belly and Impact Factors of Quality.

Kyung Jo, Seonmin Lee, Seul-Ki-Chan Jeong, Hayeon Jeon, Hyeum Bum Kim, Pil Nam Seong, Samooel Jung

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Food science of animal resources, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kyung JoDepartment of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3006-5396
Seonmin LeeDepartment of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5713-1795
Seul-Ki-Chan JeongDepartment of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2163-8340
Hayeon JeonDepartment of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3741-7696
Hyeum Bum KimDepartment of Animal Resources Science, Dankook University, Cheonan 16890, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1366-6090
Pil Nam SeongNational Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Wanju 55365, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2915-1059
Samooel JungDepartment of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8116-188X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pork belly is one of the most valuable primal cuts of pork with high preferences. Although meat quality is becoming increasingly important, defining pork belly quality is challenging owing to the structure and diversity of the preferred characteristics. This study identified the factors influencing pork belly quality traits through a literature review. In total, 55 articles related to pork belly quality were selected and summarized. The quality traits of pork belly are considered to be various factors, including belly yield (weight, length, thickness, etc.), firmness, fatty acid composition, color, and sensory properties. The quality of pork belly is influenced by various factors, such as sex, genetic parameters, carcass weight, and diet. A more diverse approach is required to comprehensively understand the quality traits and impact factors of pork bellies.

Indexed as

endogenous factorexogenous factorporkpork bellyquality

Identifiers

PMID40093638
PMCPMC11907425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.