ArticleFood science of animal resources2025
Evaluating Energy Consumption and Thermophysical Characteristics of Camel (
Article in Food science of animal resources, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effects of cooking technique and meat cut on the physical and thermal characteristics of camel (Camelus dromedarius) meat.Animal bioscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study focused on developing an innovative cooking technique for camel meat by integrating ohmic heating with sous vide (SV) cooking. The newly developed ohmic-sous vide (OSV) system, featuring automated temperature control and SV pouches, was evaluated against the conventional SV method. Performance was assessed based on energy parameters and thermophysical characteristics at various cooking temperatures (70°C, 80°C, and 90°C) and durations (30, 60, 90, and 120 min). The results demonstrated that the OSV system required significantly less energy and preheating time compared to the traditional SV method, achieving superior energy efficiency. While final meat yields were comparable between the two methods, energy efficiency for OSV cooking reached 80.3% at 70°C after 30 min, compared to 58.36% for the SV method. At 80°C, the energy efficiencies were 75.77% for OSV cooking compared to 51.19% for SV, and at 90°C, they were 70.97% versus 44.30%, respectively. Additionally, thermophysical properties of camel meat, including thermal conductivity, thermal diffusivity, specific heat, density, and cooking yield, showed significant decreases as cooking temperature and time increased for both cooking methods. Notably, camel meat prepared using OSV exhibited lower thermal conductivity and density than that cooked with SV, reflecting structural changes that may enhance tenderness and juiciness. These findings suggest that the integrated OSV technique offers promising energy efficiency benefits in the culinary meat industry, highlighting the need for further research into its broader applications and advantages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.