Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40093623›Full record

ArticleFood science of animal resources2025

Evaluating Energy Consumption and Thermophysical Characteristics of Camel (

Moath Othman, Bandar Alfaifi, Ali Hobani, Gamaleldin M Suliman, Saleh Al-Ghamdi, Mansour Ibrahim, Ronnel Blanqueza Fulleros, Mohamed Shady, Maged Al-Garadi, Wael Elamin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food science of animal resources, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Moath OthmanDepartment of Agricultural Engineering, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9368-8913
Bandar AlfaifiDepartment of Agricultural Engineering, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8934-6339
Ali HobaniDepartment of Agricultural Engineering, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3550-9783
Gamaleldin M SulimanDepartment of Animal Production, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9865-1589
Saleh Al-GhamdiDepartment of Agricultural Engineering, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5230-5314
Mansour IbrahimDepartment of Agricultural Engineering, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2844-8897
Ronnel Blanqueza FullerosDepartment of Agricultural Engineering, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3992-4847
Mohamed ShadyDepartment of Agricultural Engineering, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9285-5959
Maged Al-GaradiDepartment of Animal Production, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0388-7669
Wael ElaminDepartment of Agricultural Engineering, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1187-5625

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study focused on developing an innovative cooking technique for camel meat by integrating ohmic heating with sous vide (SV) cooking. The newly developed ohmic-sous vide (OSV) system, featuring automated temperature control and SV pouches, was evaluated against the conventional SV method. Performance was assessed based on energy parameters and thermophysical characteristics at various cooking temperatures (70°C, 80°C, and 90°C) and durations (30, 60, 90, and 120 min). The results demonstrated that the OSV system required significantly less energy and preheating time compared to the traditional SV method, achieving superior energy efficiency. While final meat yields were comparable between the two methods, energy efficiency for OSV cooking reached 80.3% at 70°C after 30 min, compared to 58.36% for the SV method. At 80°C, the energy efficiencies were 75.77% for OSV cooking compared to 51.19% for SV, and at 90°C, they were 70.97% versus 44.30%, respectively. Additionally, thermophysical properties of camel meat, including thermal conductivity, thermal diffusivity, specific heat, density, and cooking yield, showed significant decreases as cooking temperature and time increased for both cooking methods. Notably, camel meat prepared using OSV exhibited lower thermal conductivity and density than that cooked with SV, reflecting structural changes that may enhance tenderness and juiciness. These findings suggest that the integrated OSV technique offers promising energy efficiency benefits in the culinary meat industry, highlighting the need for further research into its broader applications and advantages.

Indexed as

camel meatenergy consumptionohmic heatingsous vide cookingthermophysical characteristics

Identifiers

PMID40093623
PMCPMC11907415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.