Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40093599›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in global women's health2025

Mixed methods in promoting contraceptive decision-making after voluntary-termination-of-pregnancy.

Sara Palma, Ricardo São-João, Mónica Antunes, Helena Presado

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in global women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sara PalmaNursing Research Innovation and Development Centre of Lisbon (CIDNUR), Nursing School of Lisbon (ESEL), Lisbon, Portugal.
Ricardo São-JoãoNursing Research Innovation and Development Centre of Lisbon (CIDNUR), Nursing School of Lisbon (ESEL), Lisbon, Portugal.
Mónica AntunesNursing Research Platform Lisbon of the Health Research Center (CIIS), Portuguese Catholic University, Lisbon, Portugal.
Helena PresadoNursing Research Innovation and Development Centre of Lisbon (CIDNUR), Nursing School of Lisbon (ESEL), Lisbon, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: Contraception aims to protect women from unplanned and unwanted pregnancies. The number of voluntary-terminations-of-pregnancy is an indicator that highlights issues such as difficulty accessing health services and women's lack of knowledge about contraceptives. These factors complicate choosing, adhering to, continuing, and achieving satisfaction with a contraceptive method. Mixed studies have gained prominence in health research with significant implications for care quality, particularly in nursing. Objectives: Analyze the applicability of mixed-method research in promoting contraceptive decision-making for women undergoing voluntary termination of pregnancy. Methods: A theoretical-reflective essay based on a theoretical framework guiding reflections on mixed research. This reflection explores the basic theoretical constructs of mixed methods and their applicability in promoting contraceptive decision-making for women in the process of voluntary pregnancy termination. Results: Categories emerging from qualitative study participants' statements were consolidated with quantitative data from women's responses to questionnaires. Integrating these two data types facilitated a robust analysis, discussion, and inference of results, leading to proposals for future interventions. Conclusions: Due to the advantages of the multimethod approach, we aim to disseminate its use in health research, demonstrating that combining quantitative and qualitative approaches provides greater insights into research phenomena and problems compared to using each method in isolation. This ultimately enhances care quality and contributes to scientific knowledge development.

Indexed as

contraceptioncontraceptive advicemixed studiesnurse-midwifevoluntary-termination-of-pregnancy

Identifiers

PMID40093599
PMCPMC11908582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.