ArticleJournal of mass spectrometry and advances in the clinical lab2025
MRM-based LC-MS method for accurate C-peptide quantitation.
Article in Journal of mass spectrometry and advances in the clinical lab, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- C-peptide as an important biomarker in diabetes management: The need for standardization of its measurement.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: C-peptide secretion mirrors beta-cell function and has emerged as a valuable clinical biomarker for diabetes mellitus. C-peptide measurements can provide estimates of insulin secretory capacity, aiding in clinical decision-making and differentiation between diabetes types. Unfortunately, C-peptide assays are still not standardized, which may limit their practical clinical use. We have developed an MRM-based LC-MS method that demonstrated accuracy close to our reference method. Objective: To develop and validate a mass spectrometry method for accurate quantitation of C-peptide. Method: A serum sample was spiked with isotope-labeled C-peptide as a standard. The enrichment process involved protein precipitation with methanol, solid-phase extraction, and anion exchange for C-peptide enrichment followed by Glu-C digestion. The peptide LGGGPGAGSLQPLALE was quantitated using MRM in positive ion mode. The calibration process includes C-peptide CRM material to ensure a complete traceability chain for the measurement. Results: The assay exhibited linearity across a wide range of C-peptide concentrations and a limit of quantitation of 0.058 nmol/L. The inter-day imprecision was less than 9.6 % CV, and the intra-day imprecision was less than 8.9 % CV. Spiking with bilirubin, triglycerides, and hemoglobin demonstrated no interference, except for triglycerides at very high levels. The method exhibited a strong correlation to the C-peptide reference method (r2 = 0.95). Conclusion: The developed mass spectrometry method has demonstrated accurate results in C-peptide quantitation and can serve as a supplemental method to the existing C-peptide reference method. This ensures sustained stability over time and ultimately refines the existing reference system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.