Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40093438›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India2025

Optimal Frequency for cVEMP in Users of Personal Listening Devices.

Teja Deepak Dessai, Annapurna G Parameswaran, Rashmi J Bhat, Kaushlendra Kumar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Teja Deepak DessaiManipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka India.ORCID 0000-0002-2885-1988
Annapurna G ParameswaranDr. S. R. Chandrasekhar Institute of Speech and Hearing, Bangalore, Karnataka India.ORCID 0000-0002-8596-5201
Rashmi J BhatBangalore Speech and Hearing Research Foundation, Bangalore, Karnataka India.ORCID 0000-0002-0484-8303
Kaushlendra KumarManipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka India.ORCID 0000-0001-6585-8081

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of PLDs is linked to negative effects on the inner ear. Thus, the aim of this study is to identify the optimal frequency to test cVEMP in individuals using PLDs. A cross sectional comparative study was conducted on 128 individuals who were between the ages of 15-24 years with PLD exposure were divided into two groups: control group (history of PLD exposure for at least 1 h per day at a volume less than 60% of the PLD) and an experimental group (history of PLD exposure for at least 1 h per day at a volume greater than 60% for more than 1 year). Participants underwent MIRE and cVEMP testing using tone bursts of three different frequencies (500, 750, and 1000 Hz). Further, Latency, Peak-Peak Amplitude and Asymmetric Ratio of cVEMP responses were compared between the two groups. The data were analyzed using statistical tests such as Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal-Walli's test. The findings revealed no statistically significant difference across frequencies in both groups. However, experimental group used higher output dBA values (75.4 ± 7.77 dBA). Similarly, reduced amplitudes, increased latencies and Asymmetric Ratio values were observed in experimental group suggesting a negative influence of PLDs on the vestibular system. A 500 Hz tone burst stimuli is observed to be the optimal frequency for cVEMP. However, higher values for all compared parameters of cVEMP in experimental group may depict the negative influence of PLD on the vestibular system.

Indexed as

Cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentialNoisePersonal listening devicesVestibular systemYoung adult

Identifiers

PMID40093438
PMCPMC11909322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.